Kinetics and Energetics of Photosynthetic Micro-Organisms in Photobioreactors
179
and scattering by suspended particules are neglected and light field remains
parallel, a conventional expression is [48]
dzZ = a0~)Fzx
(50)
in which a0~) is known as the extinction coefficient. Basically, this simply
states that the probability for photon absorption is proportional to the
concentration of photons; these conditions are commonly encountered in
spectrophotometry.
In this case Eq. (49) may be integrated with the boundary condition
z = 0, Fzx = Fox, giving the well-known Lambert's law
Fzx = Fo~exp(- a0~)z)
(51)
In the Lambert-Beer law, the extinction coefficient a0~) is expressed as a sum
of two terms [49]:
a(~.) = k(k) + m00Cx
(52)
in which k00 is a coefficient for the absorption of the medium, often negligible,
and m(k) is the extinction coefficient for biomass.
Importantly, for a collimated unidirectional light beam, the radiative flux
Fx is equal to the available radiant light energy 4~Jx inside the medium.
Neglecting the attenuation of light by the medium, Eqs. (51) and (52) then give
for the whole spectrum
4~Jz - Fo exp(- mCxz)
(53)
Equation (53) is an oversimplified equation for obtaining available radiant
energy profiles in an absorbing and non-scattering medium, but can be used in
Eqs. (47) and (48) to obtain a first approximation of volumetric biomass growth
rates. Integration of these equations for one-dimensional applications along the
z-axis yields the following analytical solution for the mass volumetric growth
rate:
1 (.
Fo +Kj
)
(54)
(rx) = ~tMCx ~
In \Fo exp(-- mCxL2) + Kj
in which L is the total considered optical thickness and L2 the working
illuminated length. Remembering that the compensation point for Spirulina
platensis is obtained for 4nJ = 1 W.m -2, the working illuminated length L2 is
given from the Lambert-Beer law by
lnFo
L 2 -
(55)
mCx
Equation (54) was already obtained by Ogawa et al. [43] but the integration was
performed over the total volume V, giving different values for the parameter
Kj vs the incident radiant energy flux Fo. The calculation of the working
Précédent

- 186/266

Suivant