15.2.3 Linking Track 1 and Track 2
After the top-down and bottom-up processes were completed, a composite theory of
change was then developed by the county technical team and the WAPCs. This ToC
Table 15.1 Indicators and assumptions for the integrated ToC
Results
Indicators
Assumptions
County level
outputs
Types and number of information
and communication products
There is buy-in and ownership
from the different county
departments
Percentage of population reached
Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
department established and
operationalized
Policy document produced
Number of duplicated activities
Number of development agencies
undertaking the same activities
Number of community project
proposals developed and budgets
justified
Number of dedhas (traditional natural
resource governance structures)
established
Number of natural resource management (NRM) meetings held
Local/ward level
outcomes
Types, numbers and frequency of
adjustments to climate change
adaptation activities
Uptake of information at community level
Operational county contingency and
DRR fund
DRR policy will be relevant
and responsive to community
needs
Number of projects targeting
infrastructure and services on transport,
health, water and sanitation, security,
education, food security and income
generation
Community involvement in
county coordination and
planning will be done
Number of climate change projects
financed through budget allocation
Indiscriminate, fair, equitable
and appropriate spread of
development projects/
activities across the county
Number of livestock with access to
water and pasture during dry season
Number of households with access to
water during dry season
Community and
county level
medium and
long-term impacts
Long-term Track 1 impacts can be
measured through changes in resilience
that are measured at the ward level.
This data can be captured through
aggregated data from adaptation
interventions, measured through
development performance indicators
captured by Track 2 of TAMD
Political buy in from the
county government
Community buy in
Financial plans of CCA
activities are strictly followed/
implemented
15 Using Participatory Approaches in Measuring Resilience and Development in. . .
275
After the top-down and bottom-up processes were completed, a composite theory of
change was then developed by the county technical team and the WAPCs. This ToC
Table 15.1 Indicators and assumptions for the integrated ToC
Results
Indicators
Assumptions
County level
outputs
Types and number of information
and communication products
There is buy-in and ownership
from the different county
departments
Percentage of population reached
Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
department established and
operationalized
Policy document produced
Number of duplicated activities
Number of development agencies
undertaking the same activities
Number of community project
proposals developed and budgets
justified
Number of dedhas (traditional natural
resource governance structures)
established
Number of natural resource management (NRM) meetings held
Local/ward level
outcomes
Types, numbers and frequency of
adjustments to climate change
adaptation activities
Uptake of information at community level
Operational county contingency and
DRR fund
DRR policy will be relevant
and responsive to community
needs
Number of projects targeting
infrastructure and services on transport,
health, water and sanitation, security,
education, food security and income
generation
Community involvement in
county coordination and
planning will be done
Number of climate change projects
financed through budget allocation
Indiscriminate, fair, equitable
and appropriate spread of
development projects/
activities across the county
Number of livestock with access to
water and pasture during dry season
Number of households with access to
water during dry season
Community and
county level
medium and
long-term impacts
Long-term Track 1 impacts can be
measured through changes in resilience
that are measured at the ward level.
This data can be captured through
aggregated data from adaptation
interventions, measured through
development performance indicators
captured by Track 2 of TAMD
Political buy in from the
county government
Community buy in
Financial plans of CCA
activities are strictly followed/
implemented
15 Using Participatory Approaches in Measuring Resilience and Development in. . .
275