linked the prioritized county CRM interventions identified through the score card
process with the six ward ToCs as shown in Fig. 15.2.
10
The methodology used above sought to learn lessons from two questions
namely:
• To what extent can participatory processes be used in designing a ToC that links
CRM activities (Track 1) with development outcomes (Track 2)?
• How can the framework be used to inform planning at sub-national and community levels?
When the composite ToC was developed and expected changes and indicators
were identified in the top-down, bottom-up, Track 1 and 2 linkage processes, the
County Planning Unit proceeded to integrate relevant CRM and adaptation actions
into the Isiolo County Integrated Development Plan (ICIDP) in order to mainstream
adaptation planning and M&E.
The use of a participatory approach in testing the feasibility of TAMD was
chosen, as it sought to enhance ownership of the data collected, the analysis, and the
dissemination of lessons learned. It also sought to build the evaluative capacity
Impact
Outcome
Output
National level
Increase in availability
and access to climate
information
Disaster Risk Reduction
policy adopted and
operationalised
Reduction in
concentration
and duplication of
development activities
County Coordination
and Planning
Ward level
County level
Strengthen Early
Warning Information
Systems
Increased household
income from improved
livestock products and
markets
Implementation of
water, livestock, natural
resource management
CAF Funded Projects
Development of County
Adaptation Fund
Community Projects
Communities in Isiolo are resilient to drought and other effects of climate change and impacts of drought contained
Improved standard of living
Reduction in impacts of disaster events
Strengthened NRM capacities
Livelihoods decisions
and actions taken are
informed by climate
information
DRR mainstreamed
in County plans
DRR funds
allocated
Policy Development
and Formulation
Climate
Change
Adaptation
Advocacy
Finance and
Budgeting
Improved spatial
spread and
sustainability of
development activities
Efficient utilisation of
development funds
Climate change
budgeting and financing
mainstreamed in county
budget
Coordinated project
financing and budgeting
6 ward ToCs
Fig. 15.2 Integrated Isiolo ToC. (Ibid)
10 Karani, I., Mayhew, J., & Anderson, S. (2015). Tracking adaptation and measuring development
in Isiolo County, Kenya. In D. Bours, C. McGinn, & P. Pringle (Eds.), Monitoring and evaluation
of climate change adaptation: A review of the landscape. New Directions for Evaluation, 147,
75–87.
276
I. Karani and N. Kariuki
process with the six ward ToCs as shown in Fig. 15.2.
10
The methodology used above sought to learn lessons from two questions
namely:
• To what extent can participatory processes be used in designing a ToC that links
CRM activities (Track 1) with development outcomes (Track 2)?
• How can the framework be used to inform planning at sub-national and community levels?
When the composite ToC was developed and expected changes and indicators
were identified in the top-down, bottom-up, Track 1 and 2 linkage processes, the
County Planning Unit proceeded to integrate relevant CRM and adaptation actions
into the Isiolo County Integrated Development Plan (ICIDP) in order to mainstream
adaptation planning and M&E.
The use of a participatory approach in testing the feasibility of TAMD was
chosen, as it sought to enhance ownership of the data collected, the analysis, and the
dissemination of lessons learned. It also sought to build the evaluative capacity
Impact
Outcome
Output
National level
Increase in availability
and access to climate
information
Disaster Risk Reduction
policy adopted and
operationalised
Reduction in
concentration
and duplication of
development activities
County Coordination
and Planning
Ward level
County level
Strengthen Early
Warning Information
Systems
Increased household
income from improved
livestock products and
markets
Implementation of
water, livestock, natural
resource management
CAF Funded Projects
Development of County
Adaptation Fund
Community Projects
Communities in Isiolo are resilient to drought and other effects of climate change and impacts of drought contained
Improved standard of living
Reduction in impacts of disaster events
Strengthened NRM capacities
Livelihoods decisions
and actions taken are
informed by climate
information
DRR mainstreamed
in County plans
DRR funds
allocated
Policy Development
and Formulation
Climate
Change
Adaptation
Advocacy
Finance and
Budgeting
Improved spatial
spread and
sustainability of
development activities
Efficient utilisation of
development funds
Climate change
budgeting and financing
mainstreamed in county
budget
Coordinated project
financing and budgeting
6 ward ToCs
Fig. 15.2 Integrated Isiolo ToC. (Ibid)
10 Karani, I., Mayhew, J., & Anderson, S. (2015). Tracking adaptation and measuring development
in Isiolo County, Kenya. In D. Bours, C. McGinn, & P. Pringle (Eds.), Monitoring and evaluation
of climate change adaptation: A review of the landscape. New Directions for Evaluation, 147,
75–87.
276
I. Karani and N. Kariuki