168
Mielke J, Vermaßen H, Ellenbeck S (2017) Ideals, practices, and future prospects of stakeholder
involvement in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E10648–E10657. https://
doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706085114
Mishra BK, Badola R, Bhardwaj AK (2009) Social issues and concerns in biodiversity conservation: experiences from wildlife protected areas in India. Trop Ecol 50:147–161
Naylor LA, Coombes MA, Venn O et al (2012) Facilitating ecological enhancement of coastal
infrastructure: the role of policy, people and planning. Environ Sci Pol 22:36–46. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.05.002
Neßhöver C, Timaeus J, Wittmer H et al (2013) Improving the science-policy interface of biodiversity research projects. GAIA - Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 22:99–103. https://doi.org/10.14512/
gaia.22.2.8
Nesshöver C, Vandewalle M, Wittmer H et al (2016) The network of knowledge approach:
improving the science and society dialogue on biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe.
Biodivers Conserv 25:1215–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1127-5
Noss RF, Fleishman E, Dellasala DA et al (2009) Priorities for improving the scientific foundation of conservation policy in North America. Conserv Biol 23:825–833. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01282.x
Opdam PFM, Broekmeyer MEA, Kistenkas FH (2009) Identifying uncertainties in judging the
significance of human impacts on Natura 2000 sites. Environ Sci Pol 12(7):912–921. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.04.006
Paloniemi R, Apostolopoulou E, Primmer E et al (2012) Biodiversity conservation across scales:
lessons from a science–policy dialogue. Nat Conserv 2:7–19
Plant R, Ryan P (2013) Ecosystem services as a practicable concept for natural resource management: some lessons from Australia. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 9:44–53. https://
doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.737372
Pullin AS, Stewart GB (2006) Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental
management guidelines for systematic review in conservation and. Environ Manag 20:1647–
1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x
Pullin AS, BÁldi A, Can OE et al (2009) Conservation focus on Europe: major conservation policy
issues that need to be informed by conservation science. Conserv Biol 23:818–824. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01283.x
Raina RS, Dey D (2015) The valuation conundrum: biodiversity and science-policy interface in
India’s livestock sector. Econ Pol Wkly 51:7–8
Rodela R, Reinecke S, Bregt A et al (2015) Challenges to and opportunities for biodiversity sciencepolicy interfaces. Environ Sci Pol 54:483–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.010
Rodriguez MDL, Castro AJ, Jorreto S (2015) Science–policy interface for addressing environmental problems in arid Spain. Environ Sci Policy 50:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
envsci.2015.01.013
Roqueplo P (1995) Scientific expertise among political powers, administrations and public opinion. Sci Public Policy 22:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/22.3.175
Ruckelshaus M, McKenzie E, Tallis H et al (2015) Notes from the field: lessons learned from using
ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol Econ 115:11–21. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009
Sanguinetti J, Buria L, Malmierca L et al (2014) Invasive alien species management in Patagonia,
Argentina: prioritization, achievements and science-policy integration challenges identified by
the National Parks Administration. Ecol Austral 24:183–192
Santos MB, Pierce GJ (2015) Marine mammals and good environmental status: science, policy
and society; challenges and opportunities. Hydrobiologia 750:13–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10750-014-2164-2
Sarkki S, Niemela J, Tinch R et al (2013) Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: a critical
assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces. Sci Public Policy 41:194–206
Sarkki S, Tinch R, Niemelä J et al (2015) Adding “iterativity” to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: a novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science-policy interfaces. Environ Sci
Pol 54:505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.016
I. Matsumoto et al.
Mielke J, Vermaßen H, Ellenbeck S (2017) Ideals, practices, and future prospects of stakeholder
involvement in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E10648–E10657. https://
doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706085114
Mishra BK, Badola R, Bhardwaj AK (2009) Social issues and concerns in biodiversity conservation: experiences from wildlife protected areas in India. Trop Ecol 50:147–161
Naylor LA, Coombes MA, Venn O et al (2012) Facilitating ecological enhancement of coastal
infrastructure: the role of policy, people and planning. Environ Sci Pol 22:36–46. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.05.002
Neßhöver C, Timaeus J, Wittmer H et al (2013) Improving the science-policy interface of biodiversity research projects. GAIA - Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 22:99–103. https://doi.org/10.14512/
gaia.22.2.8
Nesshöver C, Vandewalle M, Wittmer H et al (2016) The network of knowledge approach:
improving the science and society dialogue on biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe.
Biodivers Conserv 25:1215–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1127-5
Noss RF, Fleishman E, Dellasala DA et al (2009) Priorities for improving the scientific foundation of conservation policy in North America. Conserv Biol 23:825–833. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01282.x
Opdam PFM, Broekmeyer MEA, Kistenkas FH (2009) Identifying uncertainties in judging the
significance of human impacts on Natura 2000 sites. Environ Sci Pol 12(7):912–921. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.04.006
Paloniemi R, Apostolopoulou E, Primmer E et al (2012) Biodiversity conservation across scales:
lessons from a science–policy dialogue. Nat Conserv 2:7–19
Plant R, Ryan P (2013) Ecosystem services as a practicable concept for natural resource management: some lessons from Australia. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 9:44–53. https://
doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.737372
Pullin AS, Stewart GB (2006) Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental
management guidelines for systematic review in conservation and. Environ Manag 20:1647–
1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x
Pullin AS, BÁldi A, Can OE et al (2009) Conservation focus on Europe: major conservation policy
issues that need to be informed by conservation science. Conserv Biol 23:818–824. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01283.x
Raina RS, Dey D (2015) The valuation conundrum: biodiversity and science-policy interface in
India’s livestock sector. Econ Pol Wkly 51:7–8
Rodela R, Reinecke S, Bregt A et al (2015) Challenges to and opportunities for biodiversity sciencepolicy interfaces. Environ Sci Pol 54:483–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.010
Rodriguez MDL, Castro AJ, Jorreto S (2015) Science–policy interface for addressing environmental problems in arid Spain. Environ Sci Policy 50:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
envsci.2015.01.013
Roqueplo P (1995) Scientific expertise among political powers, administrations and public opinion. Sci Public Policy 22:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/22.3.175
Ruckelshaus M, McKenzie E, Tallis H et al (2015) Notes from the field: lessons learned from using
ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol Econ 115:11–21. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009
Sanguinetti J, Buria L, Malmierca L et al (2014) Invasive alien species management in Patagonia,
Argentina: prioritization, achievements and science-policy integration challenges identified by
the National Parks Administration. Ecol Austral 24:183–192
Santos MB, Pierce GJ (2015) Marine mammals and good environmental status: science, policy
and society; challenges and opportunities. Hydrobiologia 750:13–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10750-014-2164-2
Sarkki S, Niemela J, Tinch R et al (2013) Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: a critical
assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces. Sci Public Policy 41:194–206
Sarkki S, Tinch R, Niemelä J et al (2015) Adding “iterativity” to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: a novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science-policy interfaces. Environ Sci
Pol 54:505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.016
I. Matsumoto et al.