169
Schewenius M, McPhearson T, Elmqvist T (2014) Opportunities for increasing resilience and sustainability of urban social–ecological systems: insights from the URBES and the Cities and
Biodiversity Outlook Projects. Ambio 43:434–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0505-z
Seddon N, Mace GM, Naeem S et al (2016) Biodiversity in the anthropocene: prospects and policy.
Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283:20162094. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2094
Sommerwerk N, Bloesch J, Paunovi M et al (2010a) Managing the worlds most international river:
the Danube River Basin. Mar Freshw Res 61(7):736–748. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09229
Sommerwerk N, Bloesch J, Paunović M et al (2010b) Managing the world’s most international
river: the Danube River Basin. Mar Freshw Res 61:736. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09229
Spranger T, Bull K, Clair TA, Johansson M (2014) Implications of current knowledge on nitrogen deposition and impacts for policy, management and capacity building needs: CLRTAP. In:
Nitrogen deposition, critical loads and biodiversity. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 425–434
Srebotnjak T (2007) The role of environmental statisticians in environmental policy: the case
of performance measurement. Environ Sci Pol 10(5):405–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
envsci.2007.02.002
Stephenson PJ, Bowles-Newark N, Regan E et al (2015) Unblocking the flow of biodiversity
data for decision-making in Africa. Biol Conserv 213:335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
biocon.2016.09.003
Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:4–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018
Sutherland WJ, Gardner T, Bogich TL et al (2014) Solution scanning as a key policy tool: identifying management interventions to help maintain and enhanc regulating ecosystem services.
Ecol Soc 19(2):3
Thomas RJ, Akhtar-Schuster M, Stringer LC et al (2012) Fertile ground? Options for a sciencepolicy platform for land. Environ Sci Pol 16:122–135
Tinch R, Balian E, Carss D et al (2016) Science-policy interfaces for biodiversity: dynamic learning environments for successful impact. Biodivers Conserv 27(7):1679–1702. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10531-016-1155-1
Tremblay M, Vandewalle M, Wittmer H (2016) Ethical challenges at the science-policy interface: an ethical risk assessment and proposition of an ethical infrastructure. Biodivers Conserv
25(7):1253–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1123-9
Tzankova Z (2017) The science and politics of ecological risk : bioinvasions policies in the US and
Australia. Environ Pol 18(3):333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010902823725
van den Hove S (2007) A rationale for science–policy interfaces. Futures 39:807–826. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.004
van Eeten MJG (1999) “Dialogues of the deaf” on science in policy controversies. Sci Public
Policy 26:185–192. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782491
Van Haastrecht EK, Toonen HM (2011) Science-policy interactions in MPA site selection in the
Dutch part of the North Sea. Environ. Manage 47(4):656–670
Vohland K, Mlambo MC, Horta LD et al (2011) How to ensure a credible and efficient IPBES?
Environ Sci Pol 14(8):1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.005
Walther BA, Boëte C, Binot A et al (2016) Biodiversity and health: lessons and recommendations
from an interdisciplinary conference to advise southeast Asian research, society and policy.
Infect Genet Evol 40:29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.02.003
Watson RT (2012) The science–policy interface: the role of scientific assessments—UK National
Ecosystem Assessment. Proc R Soc A 468:3265–3281. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2012.0163
Weingart P (1999) Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Sci Public Policy 26:151–161. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782437
Young JC, Watt AD, van den Hove S, the SPIRAL project team (2013a) Effective interfaces
between science, policy and society: the SPIRAL project handbook
Young JC, Watt AD, van den Hove S, the SPIRAL project team (2013b) The SPIRAL synthesis
report: a resource book on science-policy interfaces
Young JC, Waylen KA, Sarkki S et al (2014) Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet
the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at oneanother. Biodivers Conserv 23:387–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0607-0
8 Mapping the Current Understanding of Biodiversity Science–Policy Interfaces
Schewenius M, McPhearson T, Elmqvist T (2014) Opportunities for increasing resilience and sustainability of urban social–ecological systems: insights from the URBES and the Cities and
Biodiversity Outlook Projects. Ambio 43:434–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0505-z
Seddon N, Mace GM, Naeem S et al (2016) Biodiversity in the anthropocene: prospects and policy.
Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283:20162094. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2094
Sommerwerk N, Bloesch J, Paunovi M et al (2010a) Managing the worlds most international river:
the Danube River Basin. Mar Freshw Res 61(7):736–748. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09229
Sommerwerk N, Bloesch J, Paunović M et al (2010b) Managing the world’s most international
river: the Danube River Basin. Mar Freshw Res 61:736. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09229
Spranger T, Bull K, Clair TA, Johansson M (2014) Implications of current knowledge on nitrogen deposition and impacts for policy, management and capacity building needs: CLRTAP. In:
Nitrogen deposition, critical loads and biodiversity. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 425–434
Srebotnjak T (2007) The role of environmental statisticians in environmental policy: the case
of performance measurement. Environ Sci Pol 10(5):405–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
envsci.2007.02.002
Stephenson PJ, Bowles-Newark N, Regan E et al (2015) Unblocking the flow of biodiversity
data for decision-making in Africa. Biol Conserv 213:335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
biocon.2016.09.003
Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:4–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018
Sutherland WJ, Gardner T, Bogich TL et al (2014) Solution scanning as a key policy tool: identifying management interventions to help maintain and enhanc regulating ecosystem services.
Ecol Soc 19(2):3
Thomas RJ, Akhtar-Schuster M, Stringer LC et al (2012) Fertile ground? Options for a sciencepolicy platform for land. Environ Sci Pol 16:122–135
Tinch R, Balian E, Carss D et al (2016) Science-policy interfaces for biodiversity: dynamic learning environments for successful impact. Biodivers Conserv 27(7):1679–1702. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10531-016-1155-1
Tremblay M, Vandewalle M, Wittmer H (2016) Ethical challenges at the science-policy interface: an ethical risk assessment and proposition of an ethical infrastructure. Biodivers Conserv
25(7):1253–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1123-9
Tzankova Z (2017) The science and politics of ecological risk : bioinvasions policies in the US and
Australia. Environ Pol 18(3):333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010902823725
van den Hove S (2007) A rationale for science–policy interfaces. Futures 39:807–826. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.004
van Eeten MJG (1999) “Dialogues of the deaf” on science in policy controversies. Sci Public
Policy 26:185–192. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782491
Van Haastrecht EK, Toonen HM (2011) Science-policy interactions in MPA site selection in the
Dutch part of the North Sea. Environ. Manage 47(4):656–670
Vohland K, Mlambo MC, Horta LD et al (2011) How to ensure a credible and efficient IPBES?
Environ Sci Pol 14(8):1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.005
Walther BA, Boëte C, Binot A et al (2016) Biodiversity and health: lessons and recommendations
from an interdisciplinary conference to advise southeast Asian research, society and policy.
Infect Genet Evol 40:29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.02.003
Watson RT (2012) The science–policy interface: the role of scientific assessments—UK National
Ecosystem Assessment. Proc R Soc A 468:3265–3281. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2012.0163
Weingart P (1999) Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Sci Public Policy 26:151–161. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782437
Young JC, Watt AD, van den Hove S, the SPIRAL project team (2013a) Effective interfaces
between science, policy and society: the SPIRAL project handbook
Young JC, Watt AD, van den Hove S, the SPIRAL project team (2013b) The SPIRAL synthesis
report: a resource book on science-policy interfaces
Young JC, Waylen KA, Sarkki S et al (2014) Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet
the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at oneanother. Biodivers Conserv 23:387–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0607-0
8 Mapping the Current Understanding of Biodiversity Science–Policy Interfaces