167
Gigante D, Attorre F, Venanzoni R et al (2016) A methodological protocol for Annex I habitats monitoring: the contribution of vegetation science. Plant Sociol 53:77–78. https://doi.
org/10.7338/pls2016532/06
Granjou C, Mauz I (2012) Expert activities as part of research work: the example of biodiversity
studies. Sci Technol Stud 25:5–22
Gustafsson KM, Lidskog R (2013) Boundary work, hybrid practices, and portable representations:
an analysis of global and national coproductions of red lists. Nat Cult 8:30–52. https://doi.
org/10.3167/nc.2013.080103
Hauck J, Görg C, Werner A et al (2014) Transdisciplinary enrichment of a linear research process:
experiences gathered from a research project supporting the European Biodiversity Strategy
to 2020. Interdiscip Sci Rev 39:376–391. https://doi.org/10.1179/0308018814Z.00000000098
Hisschemöller M, Dunn WN, Hoppe R, Ravetz J (2001) Knowledge, power and participation in
enviornmental policy analysis. Transaction Pulishers, New Brunswick
Joly CA, Rodrigues RR, Metzger JP, Haddad CFB, Verdade LM, Oliveira MC, Bolzani VS
(2010) Biodiversity conservation research, training, and policy in São Paulo. Science
328(5984):1358–1359
Keune H, Kretsch C, De Blust G et al (2013) Science–policy challenges for biodiversity, public health and urbanization: examples from Belgium. Environ Res Lett 8:025015. https://doi.
org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025015
Kim MK, Evans L, Scherl LM, Marsh H (2016) Applying governance principles to systematic
conservation decision-making in Queensland. Environ Policy Gov 26(6):452–467. https://doi.
org/10.1002/eet.1731
Koetz T, Bridgewater P, van den Hove S, Siebenhüner B (2008) The role of the subsidiary
body on scientific, technical and technological advice to the convention on biological diversity as science–policy interface. Environ Sci Pol 11:505–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
envsci.2008.05.001
Koetz T, Farrell KN, Bridgewater P (2012) Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the intergovernmental platform
for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Int Environ Agreements Polit Law Econ 12(1):1–21.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-011-9152-z
Kovács EK, Pataki G (2016) The participation of experts and knowledges in the Intergovernmental
Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environ Sci Pol 57:131–139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.007
Kueffer C, Underwood E, Hadorn GH et al (2012) Enabling effective problem-oriented research
for sustainable development. Ecol Soc 17(4):8
Larigauderie A, Mooney HA (2010a) The International Year of Biodiversity: an opportunity to
strengthen the science-policy interface for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Curr Opin
Environ Sustain 2:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.001
Larigauderie A, Mooney HA (2010b) The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for
biodiversity. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.006
Lidskog R (2014) Representing and regulating nature: boundary organisations, portable representations, and the science-policy interface. Env Polit 23(4):670–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09
644016.2013.898820
López-Rodríguez MD, Castro AJ, Castro H et al (2015) Science-policy interface for addressing
environmental problems in arid Spain. Environ Sci Pol 50:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
envsci.2015.01.013
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MA] (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis.
Island Press, Washington, DC
Mace GM, Perrings C, Le Prestre P et al (2013) Science to policy linkages for the post-2010 biodiversity targets. In: Biodiversity monitoring and conservation: bridging the gap between global
commitment and local action. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp 291–310
8 Mapping the Current Understanding of Biodiversity Science–Policy Interfaces
Gigante D, Attorre F, Venanzoni R et al (2016) A methodological protocol for Annex I habitats monitoring: the contribution of vegetation science. Plant Sociol 53:77–78. https://doi.
org/10.7338/pls2016532/06
Granjou C, Mauz I (2012) Expert activities as part of research work: the example of biodiversity
studies. Sci Technol Stud 25:5–22
Gustafsson KM, Lidskog R (2013) Boundary work, hybrid practices, and portable representations:
an analysis of global and national coproductions of red lists. Nat Cult 8:30–52. https://doi.
org/10.3167/nc.2013.080103
Hauck J, Görg C, Werner A et al (2014) Transdisciplinary enrichment of a linear research process:
experiences gathered from a research project supporting the European Biodiversity Strategy
to 2020. Interdiscip Sci Rev 39:376–391. https://doi.org/10.1179/0308018814Z.00000000098
Hisschemöller M, Dunn WN, Hoppe R, Ravetz J (2001) Knowledge, power and participation in
enviornmental policy analysis. Transaction Pulishers, New Brunswick
Joly CA, Rodrigues RR, Metzger JP, Haddad CFB, Verdade LM, Oliveira MC, Bolzani VS
(2010) Biodiversity conservation research, training, and policy in São Paulo. Science
328(5984):1358–1359
Keune H, Kretsch C, De Blust G et al (2013) Science–policy challenges for biodiversity, public health and urbanization: examples from Belgium. Environ Res Lett 8:025015. https://doi.
org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025015
Kim MK, Evans L, Scherl LM, Marsh H (2016) Applying governance principles to systematic
conservation decision-making in Queensland. Environ Policy Gov 26(6):452–467. https://doi.
org/10.1002/eet.1731
Koetz T, Bridgewater P, van den Hove S, Siebenhüner B (2008) The role of the subsidiary
body on scientific, technical and technological advice to the convention on biological diversity as science–policy interface. Environ Sci Pol 11:505–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
envsci.2008.05.001
Koetz T, Farrell KN, Bridgewater P (2012) Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the intergovernmental platform
for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Int Environ Agreements Polit Law Econ 12(1):1–21.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-011-9152-z
Kovács EK, Pataki G (2016) The participation of experts and knowledges in the Intergovernmental
Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environ Sci Pol 57:131–139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.007
Kueffer C, Underwood E, Hadorn GH et al (2012) Enabling effective problem-oriented research
for sustainable development. Ecol Soc 17(4):8
Larigauderie A, Mooney HA (2010a) The International Year of Biodiversity: an opportunity to
strengthen the science-policy interface for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Curr Opin
Environ Sustain 2:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.001
Larigauderie A, Mooney HA (2010b) The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for
biodiversity. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.006
Lidskog R (2014) Representing and regulating nature: boundary organisations, portable representations, and the science-policy interface. Env Polit 23(4):670–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09
644016.2013.898820
López-Rodríguez MD, Castro AJ, Castro H et al (2015) Science-policy interface for addressing
environmental problems in arid Spain. Environ Sci Pol 50:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
envsci.2015.01.013
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MA] (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis.
Island Press, Washington, DC
Mace GM, Perrings C, Le Prestre P et al (2013) Science to policy linkages for the post-2010 biodiversity targets. In: Biodiversity monitoring and conservation: bridging the gap between global
commitment and local action. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp 291–310
8 Mapping the Current Understanding of Biodiversity Science–Policy Interfaces