18
F. Finkel et al.
in terms of the largest eigenvalue 3 λ(x) of the transition matrix A(ε(x)) as
f (μ, T ) = −
1
β
1
0
log λ(x) dx .
(34)
We shall outline the derivation of this formula in the simplest nontrivial case m =
n = 1 in the next section.
7.1 Example: The su(1|1) Case
Although the free energy per site of the chain (24) can in principle be computed
from Eq. (34) for arbitrary values of m and n, this is almost impossible in practice
unless m and n are small enough. We shall only present here a brief description of
the simplest case m = n = 1, in which Eq. (34) yields a simple explicit expression
for the free energy per site. In this case we have only one chemical potential μ 1 ≡ μ
(for the bosonic degree of freedom), and the transfer matrix is simply
A(ε) =
q −μ q −μ/2
q ε−μ/2 q ε
.
The matrices A (i) = A(ε(x i )) are easily diagonalized:
A
(i)
= P i D
(i) P
−1
i , D
(i)
=
λ i 0
0 0
, P i =
q
−ε i −
μ
2
1
1
−q
−
μ
2
,
with ε i ≡ ε(x i ) and λ i = q ε i + q −μ . We can thus write
A
(0) A
(1) A
(2)
· · · A
(N −1)
= A
(0) P 1 D
(1) P
−1
1 P 2 D
(2) P
−1
2 · · · P N −1 D
(N −1) P
−1
N −1 .
Let us take, as an example, the PF spin chain. In this case
lim
N →∞
(ε i+1 − ε i ) = K lim
N →∞
1
N
(i + 1 − i) = 0, P
−1
i P i+1 →
N →∞
1 0
0 1
.
Thus when N → ∞ we have
A
(0) A
(1) A
(2)
· · · A
(N −1)
A
(0) P 1
N −1
i=1 λ i 0
0
0
P
−1
N −1 ,
3 Since all the matrix elements of the matrix A(ε) are positive, it follows from the Perron–Frobenius
theorem that its largest eigenvalue in module is positive and simple.
F. Finkel et al.
in terms of the largest eigenvalue 3 λ(x) of the transition matrix A(ε(x)) as
f (μ, T ) = −
1
β
1
0
log λ(x) dx .
(34)
We shall outline the derivation of this formula in the simplest nontrivial case m =
n = 1 in the next section.
7.1 Example: The su(1|1) Case
Although the free energy per site of the chain (24) can in principle be computed
from Eq. (34) for arbitrary values of m and n, this is almost impossible in practice
unless m and n are small enough. We shall only present here a brief description of
the simplest case m = n = 1, in which Eq. (34) yields a simple explicit expression
for the free energy per site. In this case we have only one chemical potential μ 1 ≡ μ
(for the bosonic degree of freedom), and the transfer matrix is simply
A(ε) =
q −μ q −μ/2
q ε−μ/2 q ε
.
The matrices A (i) = A(ε(x i )) are easily diagonalized:
A
(i)
= P i D
(i) P
−1
i , D
(i)
=
λ i 0
0 0
, P i =
q
−ε i −
μ
2
1
1
−q
−
μ
2
,
with ε i ≡ ε(x i ) and λ i = q ε i + q −μ . We can thus write
A
(0) A
(1) A
(2)
· · · A
(N −1)
= A
(0) P 1 D
(1) P
−1
1 P 2 D
(2) P
−1
2 · · · P N −1 D
(N −1) P
−1
N −1 .
Let us take, as an example, the PF spin chain. In this case
lim
N →∞
(ε i+1 − ε i ) = K lim
N →∞
1
N
(i + 1 − i) = 0, P
−1
i P i+1 →
N →∞
1 0
0 1
.
Thus when N → ∞ we have
A
(0) A
(1) A
(2)
· · · A
(N −1)
A
(0) P 1
N −1
i=1 λ i 0
0
0
P
−1
N −1 ,
3 Since all the matrix elements of the matrix A(ε) are positive, it follows from the Perron–Frobenius
theorem that its largest eigenvalue in module is positive and simple.
