xxvi
Fig. 8.14
Intervention 5 + summary of intervention 5.
Put greenery on private surfaces Add green areas
on private surfaces ............................................................. 240
Fig. 8.15
Intervention 6 + summary of intervention 6.
Green roofs: extra scenario intervention ............................ 241
Fig. 9.1
Thermal image of Vienna and surroundings by night.
There is a noticeable difference between
the urban agglomeration and the cooler rural areas ........... 263
Fig. 9.2
The Fig. shows the average hourly temperature
distribution on a given day in the summer
of 2012 – pictured here are two selected
areas in Vienna (see Sect. 9.6.2) compared to a
rural area in Seibersdorf. Results clearly reveal
significant differences in the microclimate of
the areas studied, with conspicuously
high temperatures in the city centre ................................... 263
Fig. 9.3
Average annual number of summer days
1981–2010 (far left) and possible climate
scenarios 2071–2100 ......................................................... 264
Fig. 9.4
Planning levels in the city relevant for
the reduction of the UHI effect .......................................... 268
Fig. 9.5
Location of the two pilot areas in the city ......................... 269
Fig. 9.6
Rresponses to: how did the last heat period
affect your wellbeing? ....................................................... 270
Fig. 9.7
Responses to: attitude towards measures
against heat development, weighted values ....................... 271
Fig. 9.8
Stages of the master plan process and
links to implementation of the measures ........................... 273
Fig. 9.9
Feasibility Study “Nordbahnstraße – Innstraße” –
section from an aerial view (left) and
measures discussed (right) for the winner
in the urban development competition ............................... 273
Fig. 9.10
ENVI-met model before and after building
development plus a comparison of average
hourly temperatures in the course of a reference
day before and after building development ....................... 274
Fig. 9.11
Feasibility Study “Karlsplatz” – section from
an aerial view (left) and the measures discussed (right) .... 276
Fig. 9.12
The research area in the ENVI-met model and after
implementation of selected adaptation measures,
as well as average hourly temperature on a reference
day, shown for the current building stock and for
the three adaptation scenarios ............................................ 277
Fig. 9.13
Cover of the UHI-STRAT Vienna; Download
(in German) ........................................................................ 278
List of Figures
Fig. 8.14
Intervention 5 + summary of intervention 5.
Put greenery on private surfaces Add green areas
on private surfaces ............................................................. 240
Fig. 8.15
Intervention 6 + summary of intervention 6.
Green roofs: extra scenario intervention ............................ 241
Fig. 9.1
Thermal image of Vienna and surroundings by night.
There is a noticeable difference between
the urban agglomeration and the cooler rural areas ........... 263
Fig. 9.2
The Fig. shows the average hourly temperature
distribution on a given day in the summer
of 2012 – pictured here are two selected
areas in Vienna (see Sect. 9.6.2) compared to a
rural area in Seibersdorf. Results clearly reveal
significant differences in the microclimate of
the areas studied, with conspicuously
high temperatures in the city centre ................................... 263
Fig. 9.3
Average annual number of summer days
1981–2010 (far left) and possible climate
scenarios 2071–2100 ......................................................... 264
Fig. 9.4
Planning levels in the city relevant for
the reduction of the UHI effect .......................................... 268
Fig. 9.5
Location of the two pilot areas in the city ......................... 269
Fig. 9.6
Rresponses to: how did the last heat period
affect your wellbeing? ....................................................... 270
Fig. 9.7
Responses to: attitude towards measures
against heat development, weighted values ....................... 271
Fig. 9.8
Stages of the master plan process and
links to implementation of the measures ........................... 273
Fig. 9.9
Feasibility Study “Nordbahnstraße – Innstraße” –
section from an aerial view (left) and
measures discussed (right) for the winner
in the urban development competition ............................... 273
Fig. 9.10
ENVI-met model before and after building
development plus a comparison of average
hourly temperatures in the course of a reference
day before and after building development ....................... 274
Fig. 9.11
Feasibility Study “Karlsplatz” – section from
an aerial view (left) and the measures discussed (right) .... 276
Fig. 9.12
The research area in the ENVI-met model and after
implementation of selected adaptation measures,
as well as average hourly temperature on a reference
day, shown for the current building stock and for
the three adaptation scenarios ............................................ 277
Fig. 9.13
Cover of the UHI-STRAT Vienna; Download
(in German) ........................................................................ 278
List of Figures