Références
Adebanjo D, Michaelides R (2010) Analysis of Web 2.0 enabled e-clusters: A case
study. Technovation 30(4): 238-48
Aguiton C, Cardon D (2007) The Strength of Weak Copperation: an Attempt
to Understand the Meaning of Web 2.0. Communications & Stratégies 65(1):
51-65
Akoka J (1999) La restructuration de la fonction systèmes d’information. In :
Faire de la recherche en systèmes d’information Vuibert, Fnege 259-72
Amar G (2007) Le métro du xxi
e siècle. Département du Développement et de
l’Action Territoriale, RATP, avril
Anderson C (2006) The long tail – How endless choice is creating unlimited
demand. Random House Business Books, London
Arthur B (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal 99(394): 116-31
Atelya Expert Conseil (2010) http://www.atelya.com/presentation/blogue [Dernier accès : 28/03/2010]
Barnard C (1938) The functions of the executive. Cambridge Mass
Beuscart JS, Mellet K (2008) Business Models of the Web 2.0: Advertising or the
Tale of Two Stories. Communications & Strategies, Special Issue, 165-181
Bilgram V, Brem A, Voigt KI (2008) User-centric innovations in new product
development – Systematic identifi cation of lead users harnessing interactive
and collaborative online-tolls. International Journal of Innovation Management 12(3): 419-58
Blanc F, Monomakhoff N (2008) La méthode 5 steps. Éditions AFNOR
Blau PM, Scott WR (1962) Formal Organizations: a Comparative Approach. Édition 2003, Stanford University Press
Blinn N, Lindermann N (2010) Web 2.0 in SME networks – a design science
approach considering multi-perspective requirements. Journal of Information
Science and Technology 7(1): 3-17
Boateng R, Mbarika V, Thomas C (2010) When Web 2.0 becomes an organizational learning tool: evaluating Web 2.0 tools. Development and Learning in
Organizations 24(3): 17-20
Boukef N, Kalika M (2006) La théorie du millefeuille, le rôle du contexte. Système d’Information et Management 4(11): 29-54
Adebanjo D, Michaelides R (2010) Analysis of Web 2.0 enabled e-clusters: A case
study. Technovation 30(4): 238-48
Aguiton C, Cardon D (2007) The Strength of Weak Copperation: an Attempt
to Understand the Meaning of Web 2.0. Communications & Stratégies 65(1):
51-65
Akoka J (1999) La restructuration de la fonction systèmes d’information. In :
Faire de la recherche en systèmes d’information Vuibert, Fnege 259-72
Amar G (2007) Le métro du xxi
e siècle. Département du Développement et de
l’Action Territoriale, RATP, avril
Anderson C (2006) The long tail – How endless choice is creating unlimited
demand. Random House Business Books, London
Arthur B (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal 99(394): 116-31
Atelya Expert Conseil (2010) http://www.atelya.com/presentation/blogue [Dernier accès : 28/03/2010]
Barnard C (1938) The functions of the executive. Cambridge Mass
Beuscart JS, Mellet K (2008) Business Models of the Web 2.0: Advertising or the
Tale of Two Stories. Communications & Strategies, Special Issue, 165-181
Bilgram V, Brem A, Voigt KI (2008) User-centric innovations in new product
development – Systematic identifi cation of lead users harnessing interactive
and collaborative online-tolls. International Journal of Innovation Management 12(3): 419-58
Blanc F, Monomakhoff N (2008) La méthode 5 steps. Éditions AFNOR
Blau PM, Scott WR (1962) Formal Organizations: a Comparative Approach. Édition 2003, Stanford University Press
Blinn N, Lindermann N (2010) Web 2.0 in SME networks – a design science
approach considering multi-perspective requirements. Journal of Information
Science and Technology 7(1): 3-17
Boateng R, Mbarika V, Thomas C (2010) When Web 2.0 becomes an organizational learning tool: evaluating Web 2.0 tools. Development and Learning in
Organizations 24(3): 17-20
Boukef N, Kalika M (2006) La théorie du millefeuille, le rôle du contexte. Système d’Information et Management 4(11): 29-54