5 The Effective Elements in Responding …
49
Table 5.9 The correlation
between equipment and
response
Correlation
Equipment Response
Equipment Pearson Correlation 1
.893 **
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
N
32
32
Response
Pearson Correlation .893 **
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
N
32
32
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
5.3.11 The Analysis of the Correlation
The correlation evaluation was applied to obtain the level and direction of action
and allows to investigate anticipated correlation amongst the two variables [27]. The
correlation evaluation is also utilized to illustrate the intensity of the connection
between two or more variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) is a gauge for
determining the intensity of the relationship amongst these two variables [8]. The
assortment of the correlation coefficient (r) as shown in Table 5.5 has revealed that the
value of r = 0.80 is acceptable of the internal consistency to reveal the constructive
and resilient correlation amongst the variables. It was indicated that the closer the
connection is to 1.0, the better the correlation amongst the two variables [6].
The Pearson correlation value between equipment and response is r = 0.893 as
shown in Table 5.9 which specifies that the value of connection is a very strong
constructive correlation and constructive. The trigger and appropriate reaction is the
vital duration of the oil spill situation in which the utilization of equipment is essential
[18]. The contribution of equipment is significant particularly in the view of the oil
spill response that requires an entire reaction [18].
Table 5.10 shows that the training amongst the response team members and all
employees including the practical exercises in the direction of the oil spill response is
clearly correlated with 0.734. The association value is ranked as the second success
factor during the oil spill response.
The value of the Pearson correlation coefficient between the management practices
and response is r = 0.647 as shown in Table 5.9 which reveals that the value of
correlation is strongly correlated [34] and [1]. The association value is ranked as
the third successful factor in the oil spill response. The influence of management
practices in relation to the oil spill response is substantial in fact the management
practices are essential in the issue of the oil spill response [10–12].
49
Table 5.9 The correlation
between equipment and
response
Correlation
Equipment Response
Equipment Pearson Correlation 1
.893 **
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
N
32
32
Response
Pearson Correlation .893 **
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
N
32
32
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
5.3.11 The Analysis of the Correlation
The correlation evaluation was applied to obtain the level and direction of action
and allows to investigate anticipated correlation amongst the two variables [27]. The
correlation evaluation is also utilized to illustrate the intensity of the connection
between two or more variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) is a gauge for
determining the intensity of the relationship amongst these two variables [8]. The
assortment of the correlation coefficient (r) as shown in Table 5.5 has revealed that the
value of r = 0.80 is acceptable of the internal consistency to reveal the constructive
and resilient correlation amongst the variables. It was indicated that the closer the
connection is to 1.0, the better the correlation amongst the two variables [6].
The Pearson correlation value between equipment and response is r = 0.893 as
shown in Table 5.9 which specifies that the value of connection is a very strong
constructive correlation and constructive. The trigger and appropriate reaction is the
vital duration of the oil spill situation in which the utilization of equipment is essential
[18]. The contribution of equipment is significant particularly in the view of the oil
spill response that requires an entire reaction [18].
Table 5.10 shows that the training amongst the response team members and all
employees including the practical exercises in the direction of the oil spill response is
clearly correlated with 0.734. The association value is ranked as the second success
factor during the oil spill response.
The value of the Pearson correlation coefficient between the management practices
and response is r = 0.647 as shown in Table 5.9 which reveals that the value of
correlation is strongly correlated [34] and [1]. The association value is ranked as
the third successful factor in the oil spill response. The influence of management
practices in relation to the oil spill response is substantial in fact the management
practices are essential in the issue of the oil spill response [10–12].