9 Analysis on Wave Generation and Hull …
85
Fig. 9.8 The grid dependent study result for both hulls
Table 9.1 Grid dependent study for hulls
B. Wave Height Result
Table 9.2 shows the wave height as engendered from both hulls between 0 and
10 s. The result was documented at the second wave cycle between 5 s to 6 s. At
5.5 s, a high wave was generated by the round bottom hull at 0.58 m while the deep
V hull showed 0.45 m of wave height at 6 s of simulation. So, it is proven that less
wave height was generated by the deep V hull unlike the round bottom hull. The
graph illustrates the 2 million mesh elements for time (s) vs wave height (m) of both
designs. The wave height as shown in the graph was taken from probe number 3.
The result was obtained from the 2 million of mesh element number of two distinct
designs. The wave altitude was gauged at the second cycle at the ranges of 4 s and
6 s. The wave peak at cycle 3 was not readable as a result of a confrontation between
wave rumination and creation which led to a wave cancellation (Fig. 9.9).
C. Resolution Results
Figures 9.10, 9.11, 9.12, and 9.13 display the different resolutions for the analysis.
The mesh size determined the resolution and mesh element number. In this study, the
quantity of mesh elements produced was ascertained by the mesh size. The results
85
Fig. 9.8 The grid dependent study result for both hulls
Table 9.1 Grid dependent study for hulls
B. Wave Height Result
Table 9.2 shows the wave height as engendered from both hulls between 0 and
10 s. The result was documented at the second wave cycle between 5 s to 6 s. At
5.5 s, a high wave was generated by the round bottom hull at 0.58 m while the deep
V hull showed 0.45 m of wave height at 6 s of simulation. So, it is proven that less
wave height was generated by the deep V hull unlike the round bottom hull. The
graph illustrates the 2 million mesh elements for time (s) vs wave height (m) of both
designs. The wave height as shown in the graph was taken from probe number 3.
The result was obtained from the 2 million of mesh element number of two distinct
designs. The wave altitude was gauged at the second cycle at the ranges of 4 s and
6 s. The wave peak at cycle 3 was not readable as a result of a confrontation between
wave rumination and creation which led to a wave cancellation (Fig. 9.9).
C. Resolution Results
Figures 9.10, 9.11, 9.12, and 9.13 display the different resolutions for the analysis.
The mesh size determined the resolution and mesh element number. In this study, the
quantity of mesh elements produced was ascertained by the mesh size. The results