of a settlement area due to events. The residential area that will be the object of study is Jalan
Jaksa, Central Jakarta. This road is known to have a long history. The development of a residential
area into a tourism area has occurred since the end of 1968 until now. Since 2011, Jalan Jaksa has
been designated as a Night Tourism Area. The contents of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Governor
Regulation Number 53 of 2011 concerning Guidelines for City Design for Special Areas of the
Jaksa Street Corridor states that the emphasis on the arrangement of the Jalan Jaksa corridor is on
the arrangement of mass of buildings, facades, pedestrian tourist routes and public space planning.
In more detail, Jalan Jaksa is projected to be built into a central corridor for tourist accommodation,
entertainment and snacks that are attractive and nuanced to local Jakarta culture and are active for
24 hours, but still comfortable to live in and friendly to pedestrians. Jalan Jaksa is expected to
become a special corridor for left-to-time traffic through traffic restrictions and setting maximum
parking standards.
The ebb and flow of objects and tourist attractions in Jalan Jaksa is greatly influenced by the
Indonesian economic situation (Haristianti & Pratiwi 2020). The changes that occurred on Jalan
Jaksa were very dynamic. In this case, the transformation process occurs due to supply-demand in
the form of visitor needs, as well as tourists and the response of local communities. Therefore, the
discussion regarding temporary spatial changes in the corridor of Jalan Jaksa is considered worthy
of discussion because it has many relationships with other aspects of society, including economic
and social aspects. The purpose of this paper is to determine the extent to which the impact of the
event which causes temporary spaces in the corridor to appear at certain times has an effect on the
creation of territorial transformation in the corridor structure. The research, which was carried out
as an academic exercise, is expected to produce new knowledge related to spatial transformation
of the Corridor on Jalan Jaksa. The collected information is also expected to be a recommendation
for related parties (for example local governments) to monitor the course of changes that have
occurred in this area so that it becomes more focused and sustainable.
2 RESEARCH METHOD
The research method used in this paper is a qualitative method (Creswell 2002) with a time setting
of before and after studies (also known as the pretest / post-test design (Kumar 2005) with a
number of contacts twice. The sample is carried out by comparisons of two time periods, namely
past conditions from Google Earth Satellite digital data, as well as direct observations. The aim
is to obtain a clear picture of the changing situation in the corridor of the case study area to
assess the direction of its temporary spatial transformation. Soft space attribute that can be used
as a benchmark for assessing spatial transformation, including the width of the road area on the
sidewalk, public open space for residents, the garden of the occupancy and road attributes.
2.1 Data collection method
The primary data collection method uses field observation methods compared with the results of
documentation in the form of past photos obtained from satellite photos and also digital documentation from various sources. At this stage, the writer acts as a non-participant (Kumar 2005). In
the first observation, the authors compared the results of satellite photos from 2004 - 2014 and
examined the spatial parts of the residential corridors that are likely to change when viewed from
satellite capture by means of montage. After that, the results of these observations are used as a
reference for conducting direct surveys. As for the second survey stage (direct survey), the sample
was selected by non-random or probability sampling by selecting the parts of the corridor that were
seen to have changed from the data obtained in the first survey. To enrich the information, the
authors also conducted unstructured interviews with business owners and visitors who were in the
case study location in the sampling area.
82
Jaksa, Central Jakarta. This road is known to have a long history. The development of a residential
area into a tourism area has occurred since the end of 1968 until now. Since 2011, Jalan Jaksa has
been designated as a Night Tourism Area. The contents of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Governor
Regulation Number 53 of 2011 concerning Guidelines for City Design for Special Areas of the
Jaksa Street Corridor states that the emphasis on the arrangement of the Jalan Jaksa corridor is on
the arrangement of mass of buildings, facades, pedestrian tourist routes and public space planning.
In more detail, Jalan Jaksa is projected to be built into a central corridor for tourist accommodation,
entertainment and snacks that are attractive and nuanced to local Jakarta culture and are active for
24 hours, but still comfortable to live in and friendly to pedestrians. Jalan Jaksa is expected to
become a special corridor for left-to-time traffic through traffic restrictions and setting maximum
parking standards.
The ebb and flow of objects and tourist attractions in Jalan Jaksa is greatly influenced by the
Indonesian economic situation (Haristianti & Pratiwi 2020). The changes that occurred on Jalan
Jaksa were very dynamic. In this case, the transformation process occurs due to supply-demand in
the form of visitor needs, as well as tourists and the response of local communities. Therefore, the
discussion regarding temporary spatial changes in the corridor of Jalan Jaksa is considered worthy
of discussion because it has many relationships with other aspects of society, including economic
and social aspects. The purpose of this paper is to determine the extent to which the impact of the
event which causes temporary spaces in the corridor to appear at certain times has an effect on the
creation of territorial transformation in the corridor structure. The research, which was carried out
as an academic exercise, is expected to produce new knowledge related to spatial transformation
of the Corridor on Jalan Jaksa. The collected information is also expected to be a recommendation
for related parties (for example local governments) to monitor the course of changes that have
occurred in this area so that it becomes more focused and sustainable.
2 RESEARCH METHOD
The research method used in this paper is a qualitative method (Creswell 2002) with a time setting
of before and after studies (also known as the pretest / post-test design (Kumar 2005) with a
number of contacts twice. The sample is carried out by comparisons of two time periods, namely
past conditions from Google Earth Satellite digital data, as well as direct observations. The aim
is to obtain a clear picture of the changing situation in the corridor of the case study area to
assess the direction of its temporary spatial transformation. Soft space attribute that can be used
as a benchmark for assessing spatial transformation, including the width of the road area on the
sidewalk, public open space for residents, the garden of the occupancy and road attributes.
2.1 Data collection method
The primary data collection method uses field observation methods compared with the results of
documentation in the form of past photos obtained from satellite photos and also digital documentation from various sources. At this stage, the writer acts as a non-participant (Kumar 2005). In
the first observation, the authors compared the results of satellite photos from 2004 - 2014 and
examined the spatial parts of the residential corridors that are likely to change when viewed from
satellite capture by means of montage. After that, the results of these observations are used as a
reference for conducting direct surveys. As for the second survey stage (direct survey), the sample
was selected by non-random or probability sampling by selecting the parts of the corridor that were
seen to have changed from the data obtained in the first survey. To enrich the information, the
authors also conducted unstructured interviews with business owners and visitors who were in the
case study location in the sampling area.
82