Fig. 6.14 Effective Young’s modulus vs. interface parameter at volume fraction of 48% (the
thickness of interphase is 1/100 of the diameter of particles) (Nie 2005)
Fig. 6.15 Effective Young’s modulus vs. interface parameter at volume fraction of 48% (the
thickness of interphase is 1/1000 of the diameter of particles) (Nie 2005; Basaran et al. 2008a, b)
6.7 Micromechanical Constitutive Model of the Particulate Composite
321
thickness of interphase is 1/100 of the diameter of particles) (Nie 2005)
Fig. 6.15 Effective Young’s modulus vs. interface parameter at volume fraction of 48% (the
thickness of interphase is 1/1000 of the diameter of particles) (Nie 2005; Basaran et al. 2008a, b)
6.7 Micromechanical Constitutive Model of the Particulate Composite
321