142
A. F. Mohamed and M. I. Rasnan
Fig. 9.2 Kuala Lumpur City
Households’ E-waste
disposal practices
47.5 40 45.8 44.2 40.8 45.8
17.5 27.5 21.7 22.5 24.2
24.2
24.2 21.7 21.7 21.7 22.5
19.2
6.7
5
5
5
5
4.2
3.3 3.3 3.3 4.2
5
5
0.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.7
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percentage (%)
Household EEE
E E - w a s t e D i s p o s a l P r a c t i c e s
Sell
Storage
Discard
Donate/Others
Recycle
Retailer
computers and air-conditioners, which made collection procedures more systematic
and profitable. Only about 20–30% of E-waste obtained by partial recyclers are from
households, mostly through formal channels and occasional awareness campaigns.
Refer to Fig. 9.1, Tables 9.1 and 9.2, there is a critical needs to enhance community
role towards effective E-wastes recovery activities for SCP requirements. Their role
could be enhance by understanding the material flow of E-waste from households to
recovery and disposals (Springer International Publishing AG 2018).
Material flow analyses (MFA) was conducted with the system boundary, which
covers processes of E-waste management in the city of Kuala Lumpur. As can be seen
on Fig. 9.3 below, it begins from the collection of E-waste from households, and end
with the material recovery facilities and landfill. In the MFA diagram (Fig. 9.3), there
are three key tiers that important for E-waste recovery in Kuala Lumpur city. The first
tier of the MFA is essentially the representation of household disposal practices. Tier
1 illustrated the movement of E-waste to six receiver, namely scrap collector, waste
collector, donation or charity, recycling center, retailer and storage. Majority of the
Précédent

- 148/643

Suivant