References
53
14. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, K. Šindelka, M. Lísal, B. Andreon,
E.B. Kaiser, G. Mogni, G. Goldbeck, R. Kunze, G. Summer, A. Fiseni, H. Brüning, P. Schiffels,
W.L. Cavalcanti, Ontologies for the Virtual Materials Marketplace. Künstl. Intell. 34(3), 423–
428 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00648-9
15. G. Goldbeck, E. Ghedini, A. Hashibon, G.J. Schmitz, J. Friis, A reference language and ontology for materials modelling and interoperability, in Proceedings of NWC, NAFEMS (Knutsford,
UK, 2019) p NWC_19_86 (2019)
16. EMMC Coordination and Support Action, European Materials and Modelling Ontology (2020),
https://github.com/emmo-repo/, https://emmc.info/emmo-info/. Accessed 8 Apr 2020
17. A.F. De Baas (ed.), What makes a material function? (EU Publications Office, Luxembourg,
Let me compute the ways, 2017)
18. EMMC Coordination and Support Action, EMMC Translation Case Template. Technical report
(2017). Accessed 1 Mar 2020
19. D. Hristova-Bogaerds, P. Asinari, N.A. Konchakova, L. Bergamasco, A. Marcos Ramos, G.
Goldbeck, D. Höche, O. Swang, G.J. Schmitz, EMMC Translators’ Guide. Technical report,
European Materials Modelling Council (2019). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3552260
20. CEN-CENELEC Management Centre, Materials modelling: terminology, classification and
metadata. CEN workshop agreement 17284, Brussels, Belgium (2018)
21. D. Connolly, L. Miller, RDF Calendar: an application of the resource description framework
to iCalendar data. Interest group note, W3C, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA (2005), https://
www.w3.org/TR/rdfcal/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
22. W. Ceusters, An information artifact ontology perspective on data collections and associated
representational artifacts. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 180, 68–72 (2012)
23. C.S. Peirce, Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel
Hill, North Carolina, USA, 1991)
24. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, B. Schembera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, Semantic interoperability based on the European materials and modelling ontology and its ontological paradigm:
mereosemiotics, in Proceedings of WCCM-ECCOMAS 2020, to appear (2021). https://doi.org/
10.5281/zenodo.3902900
25. J. Ison, M. Kalaš, I. Jonassen, D. Bolser, M. Uluda˘ g, H. McWilliam, J. Malone, R. López, S.
Pettifer, P. Rice, EDAM: an ontology of bioinformatics operations, types of data and identifiers,
topics and formats. Bioinform. 29(10), 1225–1332 (2013)
26. N. Bassiliades, M. Symeonidis, P. Gouvas, E. Kontopoulos, G. Meditskos, I. Vlhavas, PaaSPort
semantic model: an ontology for a platform-as-a-service semantically interoperable marketplace. Data Knowl. Eng. 113, 81–115 (2018)
27. M.T. Horsch, C. Niethammer, G. Boccardo, P. Carbone, S. Chiacchiera, M. Chiricotto, J.D.
Elliott, V. Lobaskin, P. Neumann, P. Schiffels, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, J. Vrabec, W.L.
Cavalcanti, Semantic interoperability and characterization of data provenance in computational
molecular engineering. J. Chem. Eng. Data 65(3), 1313–1329 (2020)
28. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, B. Schembera, P. Klein, N.A. Konchakova, Pragmatic interoperability and translation of industrial engineering problems into
modelling and simulation solutions, in Proceedings of DAMDID 2020, to appear (2021). https://
doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3902873
29. G. Rutkai, J. Vrabec, Empirical fundamental equation of state for phosgene based on molecular
simulation data. J. Chem. Eng. Data 60(10), 2895–2905 (2015)
30. J.G. Barrientos, E.R. Cruz Sosa, P.E. García Castro, Considerations of e-commerce within a
globalizing context. Int. J. Manag. Informat. Sys. 16(1), 101–110 (2012)
31. K.H. Pries, J.M. Quigley, Reducing Process Costs with Lean, Six Sigma, and Value Engineering
Techniques (CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2013)
32. EMMC Coordination and Support Action, Report on business related quality attributes for
industry integration of materials modelling. EMMC-CSA project deliverable 6.3, EU, Horizon
2020 research and innovation programme (2018)
33. J. Machaˇ c, F. Steiner, J. Tupa, Product life cycle risk management, in Risk Management Treatise
for Engineering Professionals, ed. by C.F. Oudoza (London, UK, IntechOpen, 2018), pp. 51–72
53
14. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, K. Šindelka, M. Lísal, B. Andreon,
E.B. Kaiser, G. Mogni, G. Goldbeck, R. Kunze, G. Summer, A. Fiseni, H. Brüning, P. Schiffels,
W.L. Cavalcanti, Ontologies for the Virtual Materials Marketplace. Künstl. Intell. 34(3), 423–
428 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00648-9
15. G. Goldbeck, E. Ghedini, A. Hashibon, G.J. Schmitz, J. Friis, A reference language and ontology for materials modelling and interoperability, in Proceedings of NWC, NAFEMS (Knutsford,
UK, 2019) p NWC_19_86 (2019)
16. EMMC Coordination and Support Action, European Materials and Modelling Ontology (2020),
https://github.com/emmo-repo/, https://emmc.info/emmo-info/. Accessed 8 Apr 2020
17. A.F. De Baas (ed.), What makes a material function? (EU Publications Office, Luxembourg,
Let me compute the ways, 2017)
18. EMMC Coordination and Support Action, EMMC Translation Case Template. Technical report
(2017). Accessed 1 Mar 2020
19. D. Hristova-Bogaerds, P. Asinari, N.A. Konchakova, L. Bergamasco, A. Marcos Ramos, G.
Goldbeck, D. Höche, O. Swang, G.J. Schmitz, EMMC Translators’ Guide. Technical report,
European Materials Modelling Council (2019). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3552260
20. CEN-CENELEC Management Centre, Materials modelling: terminology, classification and
metadata. CEN workshop agreement 17284, Brussels, Belgium (2018)
21. D. Connolly, L. Miller, RDF Calendar: an application of the resource description framework
to iCalendar data. Interest group note, W3C, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA (2005), https://
www.w3.org/TR/rdfcal/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
22. W. Ceusters, An information artifact ontology perspective on data collections and associated
representational artifacts. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 180, 68–72 (2012)
23. C.S. Peirce, Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel
Hill, North Carolina, USA, 1991)
24. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, B. Schembera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, Semantic interoperability based on the European materials and modelling ontology and its ontological paradigm:
mereosemiotics, in Proceedings of WCCM-ECCOMAS 2020, to appear (2021). https://doi.org/
10.5281/zenodo.3902900
25. J. Ison, M. Kalaš, I. Jonassen, D. Bolser, M. Uluda˘ g, H. McWilliam, J. Malone, R. López, S.
Pettifer, P. Rice, EDAM: an ontology of bioinformatics operations, types of data and identifiers,
topics and formats. Bioinform. 29(10), 1225–1332 (2013)
26. N. Bassiliades, M. Symeonidis, P. Gouvas, E. Kontopoulos, G. Meditskos, I. Vlhavas, PaaSPort
semantic model: an ontology for a platform-as-a-service semantically interoperable marketplace. Data Knowl. Eng. 113, 81–115 (2018)
27. M.T. Horsch, C. Niethammer, G. Boccardo, P. Carbone, S. Chiacchiera, M. Chiricotto, J.D.
Elliott, V. Lobaskin, P. Neumann, P. Schiffels, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, J. Vrabec, W.L.
Cavalcanti, Semantic interoperability and characterization of data provenance in computational
molecular engineering. J. Chem. Eng. Data 65(3), 1313–1329 (2020)
28. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, B. Schembera, P. Klein, N.A. Konchakova, Pragmatic interoperability and translation of industrial engineering problems into
modelling and simulation solutions, in Proceedings of DAMDID 2020, to appear (2021). https://
doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3902873
29. G. Rutkai, J. Vrabec, Empirical fundamental equation of state for phosgene based on molecular
simulation data. J. Chem. Eng. Data 60(10), 2895–2905 (2015)
30. J.G. Barrientos, E.R. Cruz Sosa, P.E. García Castro, Considerations of e-commerce within a
globalizing context. Int. J. Manag. Informat. Sys. 16(1), 101–110 (2012)
31. K.H. Pries, J.M. Quigley, Reducing Process Costs with Lean, Six Sigma, and Value Engineering
Techniques (CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2013)
32. EMMC Coordination and Support Action, Report on business related quality attributes for
industry integration of materials modelling. EMMC-CSA project deliverable 6.3, EU, Horizon
2020 research and innovation programme (2018)
33. J. Machaˇ c, F. Steiner, J. Tupa, Product life cycle risk management, in Risk Management Treatise
for Engineering Professionals, ed. by C.F. Oudoza (London, UK, IntechOpen, 2018), pp. 51–72