343
References
Auld K (2017) Trade measures to prevent illegal fishing and the WTO: an analysis of the settled
Faroe Islands dispute. World Trade Rev (Online):1–28
Bartels L (2001) Applicable law in WTO dispute settlement proceedings. J World Trade 35:499–519
Bhala R (1999a) The myth about stare decisis and international trade law (part one of a trilogy).
Am Univ Int Law Rev 14:845–956
Bhala R (1999b) The precedent setters: de facto stare decisis in WTO adjudication (part two of a
trilogy). J Transnatl Law Policy 9:1–151
Bhala R (2001) The power of the past: towards de jure stare decisis in WTO adjudication (part
three of a trilogy). George Wash Int Law Rev 33:873–978
Brack D (1998) The Shrimp-Turtle case: implications for the multilateral environmental agreement – World Trade Organisation debate. Yearb Int Environ Law 9:13–19
Chang HF (2005) Environmental trade measures, the shrimp-turtle rulings, and the ordinary meaning of the text of the GATT. Chapman Law Rev 8:25–51
Charnovitz S (1994) Free trade, fair trade, green trade: defogging the debate. Cornell Int Law
J 27:459–525
Charnovitz S (2002) The law of environmental “PPMs” in the WTO: debunking the myth of illegality. Yale J Int Law 27:59–110
Chen CJ (2010) Fisheries subsidies under international law. Springer, Heidelberg
Conrad CR (2007) The EC-Biotech dispute and applicability of the SPS agreement. World Trade
Rev 6:233–248
Cosbey A, Mavroidis PC (2014) Heavy fuel: trade and environment in the GATT/WTO case law.
Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 23:288–301
Dailey V (2000) Sustainable development: revaluating the trade vs. turtles conflict at the WTO. J
Transnatl Law Policy 9:331–383
Del Vecchio A (2015) I tribunali internazionali tra globalizzazione e localismi, 2nd edn. Cacucci,
Bari
Dostal DJ (2005) Global fisheries subsidies: will the WTO reel in effective regulations? Univ Pa
J Int Econ Law 26:815–839
Fagenholz A (2004) A fish in water: sustainable Canadian Atlantic fisheries management and international law. Univ Pa J Int Econ Law 25:639–667
Flett J (2012) Importing other international regimes into World Trade Organization litigation. In:
Young MA (ed) Regime interaction in international law: facing fragmentation. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, pp 261–304
Gradoni L (2009) Regime failure nel diritto internazionale. CEDAM, Padova
Guruswamy LD (1998a) Should UNCLOS or GATT/WTO decide trade and environment disputes? Minn J Global Trade 7:287–328
Guruswamy LD (1998b) The promise of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS): justice in trade and environment disputes. Ecol Law Q 25:189–227
Howse R (2002) The Appellate body rulings in the Shrimp/Turtle case: a new legal baseline for the
trade and environment debate. Columbia J Environ Law 27:491–522
Hubert A-M, Craik N (2018) Towards normative coherence in the international law of the sea for the
conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. http://site.uit.no/jclos/files/2018/02/JCLOS-Coherence-Blog-Hubert-Craik-v-2.pdf
Jackson JH (1992) World trade rules and environmental policies: congruence or conflict. Wash Lee
Law Rev 49:1227–1278
Kelly JP (2005) The seduction of the Appellate body: Shrimp/Sea Turtle I and II and the proper
role of States in WTO governance. Cornell Int Law J 38:459–491
Knox JH (2004) The judicial resolution of conflicts between trade and the environment. Harv
Environ Law Rev 28:1–78
Kuijper PJ (1994) The law of GATT as a special field of international law. Neth Yearb Int Law
25:227–257
The Relationship Between International Trade Law and the Law of the Sea in the WTO…
References
Auld K (2017) Trade measures to prevent illegal fishing and the WTO: an analysis of the settled
Faroe Islands dispute. World Trade Rev (Online):1–28
Bartels L (2001) Applicable law in WTO dispute settlement proceedings. J World Trade 35:499–519
Bhala R (1999a) The myth about stare decisis and international trade law (part one of a trilogy).
Am Univ Int Law Rev 14:845–956
Bhala R (1999b) The precedent setters: de facto stare decisis in WTO adjudication (part two of a
trilogy). J Transnatl Law Policy 9:1–151
Bhala R (2001) The power of the past: towards de jure stare decisis in WTO adjudication (part
three of a trilogy). George Wash Int Law Rev 33:873–978
Brack D (1998) The Shrimp-Turtle case: implications for the multilateral environmental agreement – World Trade Organisation debate. Yearb Int Environ Law 9:13–19
Chang HF (2005) Environmental trade measures, the shrimp-turtle rulings, and the ordinary meaning of the text of the GATT. Chapman Law Rev 8:25–51
Charnovitz S (1994) Free trade, fair trade, green trade: defogging the debate. Cornell Int Law
J 27:459–525
Charnovitz S (2002) The law of environmental “PPMs” in the WTO: debunking the myth of illegality. Yale J Int Law 27:59–110
Chen CJ (2010) Fisheries subsidies under international law. Springer, Heidelberg
Conrad CR (2007) The EC-Biotech dispute and applicability of the SPS agreement. World Trade
Rev 6:233–248
Cosbey A, Mavroidis PC (2014) Heavy fuel: trade and environment in the GATT/WTO case law.
Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 23:288–301
Dailey V (2000) Sustainable development: revaluating the trade vs. turtles conflict at the WTO. J
Transnatl Law Policy 9:331–383
Del Vecchio A (2015) I tribunali internazionali tra globalizzazione e localismi, 2nd edn. Cacucci,
Bari
Dostal DJ (2005) Global fisheries subsidies: will the WTO reel in effective regulations? Univ Pa
J Int Econ Law 26:815–839
Fagenholz A (2004) A fish in water: sustainable Canadian Atlantic fisheries management and international law. Univ Pa J Int Econ Law 25:639–667
Flett J (2012) Importing other international regimes into World Trade Organization litigation. In:
Young MA (ed) Regime interaction in international law: facing fragmentation. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, pp 261–304
Gradoni L (2009) Regime failure nel diritto internazionale. CEDAM, Padova
Guruswamy LD (1998a) Should UNCLOS or GATT/WTO decide trade and environment disputes? Minn J Global Trade 7:287–328
Guruswamy LD (1998b) The promise of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS): justice in trade and environment disputes. Ecol Law Q 25:189–227
Howse R (2002) The Appellate body rulings in the Shrimp/Turtle case: a new legal baseline for the
trade and environment debate. Columbia J Environ Law 27:491–522
Hubert A-M, Craik N (2018) Towards normative coherence in the international law of the sea for the
conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. http://site.uit.no/jclos/files/2018/02/JCLOS-Coherence-Blog-Hubert-Craik-v-2.pdf
Jackson JH (1992) World trade rules and environmental policies: congruence or conflict. Wash Lee
Law Rev 49:1227–1278
Kelly JP (2005) The seduction of the Appellate body: Shrimp/Sea Turtle I and II and the proper
role of States in WTO governance. Cornell Int Law J 38:459–491
Knox JH (2004) The judicial resolution of conflicts between trade and the environment. Harv
Environ Law Rev 28:1–78
Kuijper PJ (1994) The law of GATT as a special field of international law. Neth Yearb Int Law
25:227–257
The Relationship Between International Trade Law and the Law of the Sea in the WTO…