344
Lennard M (2002) Navigating by the stars: interpreting the WTO agreements. J Int Econ Law
5:17–89
Lindroos A, Mehling M (2005) Dispelling the chimera of ‘self-contained regimes’ international
law and the WTO. Eur J Int Law 16:857–877
Marceau G (1999) A call for coherence in international law: praises for the prohibition against
“clinical isolation” in WTO dispute settlement. J World Trade 33:87–152
Matz-Lück N, Wolfrum R (2010) Art. XX lit. g. In: Wolfrum R, Stoll P-T, Hestermeyer H (eds)
WTO – trade in goods. Brill, The Hague, pp 544–559
McGrady B (2008) Fragmentation of international law or “systemic integration” of treaty regimes.
J World Trade 42:589–618
McLaughlin RJ (1997) Settling trade-related disputes over the protection of marine living
resources: UNCLOS or the WTO? Georgetown Int Environ Law Rev 10:29–96
Meltzer J (2004) Interpreting the WTO agreements. A commentary on professor Pauwelyn’s
approach. Mich J Int Law 25:917–923
Merkouris P (2015) Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the principle of systemic integration. Normative
shadows in Plato’s cave. Brill, Leiden
Myers BK (2005) Trade measures and the environment: can the WTO and UNCLOS be reconciled? UCLA J Environ Law Policy 23:37–76
Neff R (2005) The Cartagena protocol and the WTO. Fordham Environ Law Rev 16:261–288
Orellana MA (2002) The Swordfish dispute between the EU and Chile at the ITLOS and the
WTO. Nordic J Int Law 71:55–81
Pauwelyn J (2001) The role of public international law in the WTO: how far can we go? Am J Int
Law 95:535–578
Pauwelyn J (2003) Conflicts of norms in public international law: how WTO law relates to other
rules of international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Picone P, Ligustro A (2002) Diritto dell’Organizzazione mondiale del commercio. Cedam, Padova
Pie J-P (2000) Responding to non-member fishing in the Atlantic. The ICCAT and NAFO experiences. In: Scheiber H (ed) Law of the sea: the common heritage and emerging challenges.
Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 197–207
Prévost D (2007) Opening Pandora’s box. Leg Issues Econ Integr 34:67–101
Qureshi AH (1999) Extraterritorial shrimps, NGOs and the WTO Appellate body. Int Comp Law
Q 48:199–206
Rau M (2002) The Swordfish case: the law of the sea v. trade. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 62:37–41
Salama R (2005) Fragmentation of international law: procedural issues arising in law of the sea
disputes. Aust N Z Marit Law J 19:24–55
Schoenbaum TJ (1992) Free international trade and protection of the environment: irreconcilable
conflict? Am J Int Law 86:700–727
Serdy A (2002) See you in port: Australia and New Zealand as third parties in the dispute between
Chile and the European community over Chile’s denial of port access to Spanish vessels fishing
for swordfish on the high seas. Melb J Int Law 3:79–119
Serdy A (2007) Law of the sea aspects of the negotiations in the WTO to harmonise rules of origin.
Int J Mar Coast Law 22:235–256
Shamsey J (2002) ITLOS vs. Goliath: the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea stands tall
with the Appellate body in the Chilean-EU Swordfish dispute. Transnatl Law Contemp Probl
12:513–540
Simmons B (1999) In search of balance: an analysis of the WTO Shrimp/Turtle Appellate Body
Report. Columbia J Environ Law 24:413–454
Stoll P-T, Vöneky S (2002) The Swordfish case: law of the sea v. trade. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 62:21–35
Stone CD (1997) Too many fishing boats, too few fish: can trade laws trim subsidies and restore
the balance in global fisheries? Ecol Law Q 24:505–543
M. I. Papa
Lennard M (2002) Navigating by the stars: interpreting the WTO agreements. J Int Econ Law
5:17–89
Lindroos A, Mehling M (2005) Dispelling the chimera of ‘self-contained regimes’ international
law and the WTO. Eur J Int Law 16:857–877
Marceau G (1999) A call for coherence in international law: praises for the prohibition against
“clinical isolation” in WTO dispute settlement. J World Trade 33:87–152
Matz-Lück N, Wolfrum R (2010) Art. XX lit. g. In: Wolfrum R, Stoll P-T, Hestermeyer H (eds)
WTO – trade in goods. Brill, The Hague, pp 544–559
McGrady B (2008) Fragmentation of international law or “systemic integration” of treaty regimes.
J World Trade 42:589–618
McLaughlin RJ (1997) Settling trade-related disputes over the protection of marine living
resources: UNCLOS or the WTO? Georgetown Int Environ Law Rev 10:29–96
Meltzer J (2004) Interpreting the WTO agreements. A commentary on professor Pauwelyn’s
approach. Mich J Int Law 25:917–923
Merkouris P (2015) Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the principle of systemic integration. Normative
shadows in Plato’s cave. Brill, Leiden
Myers BK (2005) Trade measures and the environment: can the WTO and UNCLOS be reconciled? UCLA J Environ Law Policy 23:37–76
Neff R (2005) The Cartagena protocol and the WTO. Fordham Environ Law Rev 16:261–288
Orellana MA (2002) The Swordfish dispute between the EU and Chile at the ITLOS and the
WTO. Nordic J Int Law 71:55–81
Pauwelyn J (2001) The role of public international law in the WTO: how far can we go? Am J Int
Law 95:535–578
Pauwelyn J (2003) Conflicts of norms in public international law: how WTO law relates to other
rules of international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Picone P, Ligustro A (2002) Diritto dell’Organizzazione mondiale del commercio. Cedam, Padova
Pie J-P (2000) Responding to non-member fishing in the Atlantic. The ICCAT and NAFO experiences. In: Scheiber H (ed) Law of the sea: the common heritage and emerging challenges.
Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 197–207
Prévost D (2007) Opening Pandora’s box. Leg Issues Econ Integr 34:67–101
Qureshi AH (1999) Extraterritorial shrimps, NGOs and the WTO Appellate body. Int Comp Law
Q 48:199–206
Rau M (2002) The Swordfish case: the law of the sea v. trade. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 62:37–41
Salama R (2005) Fragmentation of international law: procedural issues arising in law of the sea
disputes. Aust N Z Marit Law J 19:24–55
Schoenbaum TJ (1992) Free international trade and protection of the environment: irreconcilable
conflict? Am J Int Law 86:700–727
Serdy A (2002) See you in port: Australia and New Zealand as third parties in the dispute between
Chile and the European community over Chile’s denial of port access to Spanish vessels fishing
for swordfish on the high seas. Melb J Int Law 3:79–119
Serdy A (2007) Law of the sea aspects of the negotiations in the WTO to harmonise rules of origin.
Int J Mar Coast Law 22:235–256
Shamsey J (2002) ITLOS vs. Goliath: the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea stands tall
with the Appellate body in the Chilean-EU Swordfish dispute. Transnatl Law Contemp Probl
12:513–540
Simmons B (1999) In search of balance: an analysis of the WTO Shrimp/Turtle Appellate Body
Report. Columbia J Environ Law 24:413–454
Stoll P-T, Vöneky S (2002) The Swordfish case: law of the sea v. trade. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 62:21–35
Stone CD (1997) Too many fishing boats, too few fish: can trade laws trim subsidies and restore
the balance in global fisheries? Ecol Law Q 24:505–543
M. I. Papa