Introduction 15
fallout, public health and societal issues,” in: Social and Ethical Aspects of Radiation Risk
Management, eds. Deborah Oughton and Sven-Ove Hansson (Amsterdam: Elsevier
Science 2013), 239–258; Ksenija Hanaček and Joan Martinez-Alier, “Nuclear supply chain and environmental justice struggles in Soviet and Post-Soviet countries,”
Post-Communist Economies (2021): doi:10.1080/14631377.2021.1943917.
18. Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor (Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press, 2001); Thom Davies, “Slow violence and toxic geographies: ‘Out of sight’ to whom?” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space (2019):
doi:10.1177/2399654419841063.
19. Olga Kuchinskaya, “Twice invisible: formal representations of radiation danger.”
Social Studies of Science, 43, 1 (2013): 78–96.
20. Egle Rindzeviciute, ed., Nuclear Heritage Position Statement, 2019: https://nuclearculturalheritage.wordpress.com/nuclear-cultural-heritage-position-paper-2019/.
21. Anna Storm, Fredrik Krohn Andersson, Eglė Rindzevičiūtė, “Urban nuclear reactors and the security theatre: the making of atomic heritage in Chicago, Moscow
and Stockholm,” in: Securing Urban Heritage: Agents, Access, and Securitization, eds.
Heike Oevermann and Eszter Gantner (London: Routledge, 2019), 111–129.
22. Gisela Welz, European Products. Making and Unmaking Heritage in Cyprus (Oxford/
New York, NY: Berghahn 2015), 1.
23. Sharon J. MacDonald, “Presencing Europe’s pasts,” in: Companion to the Anthropology of Europe, eds. Ullrich Kockel, Máiréad Nic Craith, and Jonas Frykman (New
York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), 233–252.
24. This adds new dimensions to work on physicists’ poetry (fiziki-liriki). See: Mark
Kuchment. “Bridging the two cultures: the emergence of scientific prose,” in: Science
and the Soviet Social Order, ed. Loren Graham (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press, 1990), 325–340.
25. Andrej Kolesnikov, “Erinnerung als Waffe. Die Geschichtspolitik des PutinRegimes,” Osteuropa, 70, 6 (2020): 3–28.
26. Ellen Rutten, Julie Fedor, and Vera Zvereva, eds., Memory, Conflict and New Media:
Web Wars in Post-Socialist States (London, New York, NY: Routledge, 2013).
27. Ekaterina Makhotina, “Keine Experimente. Die Revolution 1917 in Russlands
Geschichtspolitik,” in: Revolution retour,” Osteuropa, 67, 6–8 (2017): 211–232;
Matthew Rendle, “Inspiring a ‘fourth revolution’? The modern revolutionary
tradition and the problems surrounding the commemoration of 1917 in 2017 in
Russia,” Historical Research, 90, 247 (2017): 230–249.
28. Cf. Makhotina, S. 223.
29. Cf. Guido Hausmann and Tanja Penter, “Der Gebrauch der Geschichte. Ukraine
2014: Ideologie vs. Historiographie” Osteuropa, 64, 9–10 (2014): 35–50.
30. Cf. On the revolution in Ukraine: Tanja Penter, “Die Oktoberrevolution in der
Peripherie: Das Beispiel Ukraine,” Jahrbuch für Historische Kommunismusforschung
(2017): 87–104; Tanja Penter, “The unemployed movement in Odessa in 1917:
social and national revolutions between Petrograd and Kiev,” in: Russia’s Revolution
in Regional Perspective (Russia’s Home Front in War and Revolution, Vol. 1), eds. S.
Badcock, L. Novikova and A. Retish (Bloomington: Slavica, 2015), 267–296.
31. Cf. Zaal Andronikashvili, “Verfemt und Vergessen. Georgiens Sozialdemokratie
und das Jahr 1917,” Osteuropa, 67, 6–8 (2017): 409–424.
32. Cf. Aleksej Bratočkin, “Hybride Erinnerungen in Belarus. Eine Literaturschau zur
Oktoberrevolution,” Osteuropa, 67, H. 6–8 (2017): 305–322.
33. Jörn Happel, Nomadische Lebenswelten und zarische Politik: Der Aufstand in Zentralasien
1916 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2010).
34. “Ofitsialʹnaia delegatsiia Tadzhikistana priniala uchastie v meropriiatiiakh v
pamiatʹ o Pervoi mirovoi voine,” National Information Agency of Tajikistan,
November 12, 2018, https://khovar.tj/rus/2018/11/ofitsialnaya-delegatsiyatadzhikistana-prinyala-uchastie-v-meropriyatiyah-v-pamyat-o-pervoj-mirovoj-vojne/.
fallout, public health and societal issues,” in: Social and Ethical Aspects of Radiation Risk
Management, eds. Deborah Oughton and Sven-Ove Hansson (Amsterdam: Elsevier
Science 2013), 239–258; Ksenija Hanaček and Joan Martinez-Alier, “Nuclear supply chain and environmental justice struggles in Soviet and Post-Soviet countries,”
Post-Communist Economies (2021): doi:10.1080/14631377.2021.1943917.
18. Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor (Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press, 2001); Thom Davies, “Slow violence and toxic geographies: ‘Out of sight’ to whom?” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space (2019):
doi:10.1177/2399654419841063.
19. Olga Kuchinskaya, “Twice invisible: formal representations of radiation danger.”
Social Studies of Science, 43, 1 (2013): 78–96.
20. Egle Rindzeviciute, ed., Nuclear Heritage Position Statement, 2019: https://nuclearculturalheritage.wordpress.com/nuclear-cultural-heritage-position-paper-2019/.
21. Anna Storm, Fredrik Krohn Andersson, Eglė Rindzevičiūtė, “Urban nuclear reactors and the security theatre: the making of atomic heritage in Chicago, Moscow
and Stockholm,” in: Securing Urban Heritage: Agents, Access, and Securitization, eds.
Heike Oevermann and Eszter Gantner (London: Routledge, 2019), 111–129.
22. Gisela Welz, European Products. Making and Unmaking Heritage in Cyprus (Oxford/
New York, NY: Berghahn 2015), 1.
23. Sharon J. MacDonald, “Presencing Europe’s pasts,” in: Companion to the Anthropology of Europe, eds. Ullrich Kockel, Máiréad Nic Craith, and Jonas Frykman (New
York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), 233–252.
24. This adds new dimensions to work on physicists’ poetry (fiziki-liriki). See: Mark
Kuchment. “Bridging the two cultures: the emergence of scientific prose,” in: Science
and the Soviet Social Order, ed. Loren Graham (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press, 1990), 325–340.
25. Andrej Kolesnikov, “Erinnerung als Waffe. Die Geschichtspolitik des PutinRegimes,” Osteuropa, 70, 6 (2020): 3–28.
26. Ellen Rutten, Julie Fedor, and Vera Zvereva, eds., Memory, Conflict and New Media:
Web Wars in Post-Socialist States (London, New York, NY: Routledge, 2013).
27. Ekaterina Makhotina, “Keine Experimente. Die Revolution 1917 in Russlands
Geschichtspolitik,” in: Revolution retour,” Osteuropa, 67, 6–8 (2017): 211–232;
Matthew Rendle, “Inspiring a ‘fourth revolution’? The modern revolutionary
tradition and the problems surrounding the commemoration of 1917 in 2017 in
Russia,” Historical Research, 90, 247 (2017): 230–249.
28. Cf. Makhotina, S. 223.
29. Cf. Guido Hausmann and Tanja Penter, “Der Gebrauch der Geschichte. Ukraine
2014: Ideologie vs. Historiographie” Osteuropa, 64, 9–10 (2014): 35–50.
30. Cf. On the revolution in Ukraine: Tanja Penter, “Die Oktoberrevolution in der
Peripherie: Das Beispiel Ukraine,” Jahrbuch für Historische Kommunismusforschung
(2017): 87–104; Tanja Penter, “The unemployed movement in Odessa in 1917:
social and national revolutions between Petrograd and Kiev,” in: Russia’s Revolution
in Regional Perspective (Russia’s Home Front in War and Revolution, Vol. 1), eds. S.
Badcock, L. Novikova and A. Retish (Bloomington: Slavica, 2015), 267–296.
31. Cf. Zaal Andronikashvili, “Verfemt und Vergessen. Georgiens Sozialdemokratie
und das Jahr 1917,” Osteuropa, 67, 6–8 (2017): 409–424.
32. Cf. Aleksej Bratočkin, “Hybride Erinnerungen in Belarus. Eine Literaturschau zur
Oktoberrevolution,” Osteuropa, 67, H. 6–8 (2017): 305–322.
33. Jörn Happel, Nomadische Lebenswelten und zarische Politik: Der Aufstand in Zentralasien
1916 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2010).
34. “Ofitsialʹnaia delegatsiia Tadzhikistana priniala uchastie v meropriiatiiakh v
pamiatʹ o Pervoi mirovoi voine,” National Information Agency of Tajikistan,
November 12, 2018, https://khovar.tj/rus/2018/11/ofitsialnaya-delegatsiyatadzhikistana-prinyala-uchastie-v-meropriyatiyah-v-pamyat-o-pervoj-mirovoj-vojne/.