97. Vu TV, Delgado-Saborit JM, Harrison RM
(2015) Particle number size distributions from
seven major sources and implications for source
apportionment studies. Atmos Environ 122:114–132
98. Stanier CO, Khlystov AY, Pandis SN (2004) Ambient
aerosol size distributions and number concentrations
measured during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study
(PAQS). Atmos Environ 38(20):3275–3284
99. Woo K, Chen D, Pui D, McMurry P (2001) Measurement of Atlanta aerosol size distributions: observations of ultrafine particle events. Aerosol Sci Technol
34(1):75–87
100. von Bismarck-Osten C, Birmili W, Ketzel M,
Massling A, Petäjä T, Weber S (2013) Characterization of parameters influencing the spatio-temporal
variability of urban particle number size distributions
in four European cities. Atmos Environ 77:415–429
101. Rawat VK, Buckley DT, Kimoto S, Lee M-H,
Fukushima N, Hogan CJ Jr (2016) Two dimensional
size–mass distribution function inversion from differential mobility analyzer–aerosol particle mass
analyzer (DMA–APM) measurements. J Aerosol
Sci 92:70–82
102. Fomin A, Poliak M, Rahinov I, Tsionsky V, Cheskis
S (2013) Combined particle mass spectrometer–
quartz crystal microbalance apparatus for in situ
nanoparticle monitoring during flame assisted synthesis. Combust Flame 160(10):2131–2140
103. Marple V, Olson B, Romay F, Hudak G, Geerts SM,
Lundgren D (2014) Second generation micro-orifice
uniform deposit impactor, 120 MOUDI-II: design,
evaluation, and application to long-term ambient
sampling. Aerosol Sci Technol 48(4):427–433
104. Keskinen J, Pietarinen K, Lehtimäki M (1992) Electrical low pressure impactor. J Aerosol Sci
23(4):353–360
105. Murphy DM, Froyd KD, Bian H, Brock CA, Dibb
JE, DiGangi JP, Diskin G, Dollner M, Kupc A,
Scheuer EM (2019) The distribution of sea-salt aerosol in the global troposphere. Atmos Chem Phys
19(6):4093–4104
106. Stolzenburg MR, McMurry PH (1991) An ultrafine
aerosol condensation nucleus counter. Aerosol Sci
Technol 14(1):48–65
107. Mirme A, Noppel M, Peil I, Salm J, Tamm E,
Tammet H (1984) Multi-channel electric aerosol
spectrometer. In: International commission for
cloud physics. 11th international conference on
atmospheric aerosols, condensation and ICE nuclei,
vol 2, pp 155–159 (SEE N85-32596 21-47)
108. Sioutas C (1999) Evaluation of the measurement
performance of the scanning mobility particle sizer
and aerodynamic particle sizer. Aerosol Sci Technol
30(1):84–92
109. Johnson T (2003) An engine exhaust particle sizer
spectrometer for transient emission particle measurements, A117. In: 7th ETH-ETH conference on
combusion generated particles
110. Manigrasso M, Protano C, Martellucci S, Mattei V,
Vitali M, Avino P (2019) Evaluation of the submicron particles distribution between mountain and
urban site: contribution of the transportation for
defining environmental and human health issues. Int
J Environ Res Public Health 16(8):1339
111. Wang J, Pikridas M, Spielman SR, Pinterich T (2017)
A fast integrated mobility spectrometer for rapid
measurement of sub-micrometer aerosol size distribution, part I: design and model evaluation. J Aerosol
Sci 108:44–55
112. Baquero T, Shukrallah S, Karolia R, Osammor O,
Inkson B (2015) Quantification of airborne roadside pollution carbon nanoparticles. J Phys Conf Ser
644(1):012023. IOP Publishing
113. Dubtsov S, Ovchinnikova T, Valiulin S, Chen X,
Manninen HE, Aalto PP, Petäjä T (2017) Laboratory
verification of aerosol diffusion spectrometer and the
application to ambient measurements of new particle
formation. J Aerosol Sci 105:10–23
114. Asbach C, Fissan H, Stahlmecke B, Kuhlbusch T, Pui
D (2009) Conceptual limitations and extensions of
lung-deposited nanoparticle surface area monitor
(NSAM). J Nanopart Res 11(1):101–109
115. Onasch T, Trimborn A, Fortner E, Jayne J, Kok G,
Williams L, Davidovits P, Worsnop D (2012) Soot
particle aerosol mass spectrometer: development,
validation, and initial application. Aerosol Sci
Technol 46(7):804–817
116. Wang W, Shao L, Guo M, Hou C, Xing J, Wu
F (2017) Physicochemical properties of individual
airborne particles in Beijing during pollution periods.
Aerosol Air Qual Res 17:3209–3219
117. Liao B-X, Gong W-C, Li Z, Tsai C-J (2019) A mass
correction method for the aerosol particle mass analyzer to measure the particle mass of sub-50 nm
nanoparticles. Aerosol Science and Technology 53
(9):1056–1066.
118. Su L, Ou Q, Cao LN, Du Q, Pui DY (2019) A new
instrument prototype to measure the geometric surface area of nanoparticles with a time resolution of 1s.
J Aerosol Sci 132:32–43
119. Scheckman JH, McMurry PH, Pratsinis SE
(2009) Rapid characterization of agglomerate aerosols by in situ mass – mobility measurements. Langmuir 25(14):8248–8254
120. Olfert J, Collings N (2005) New method for particle
mass classification—the Couette centrifugal particle
mass analyzer. J Aerosol Sci 36(11):1338–1352
121. Johnson TJ, Olfert JS, Cabot R, Treacy C, Yurteri
CU, Dickens C, McAughey J, Symonds JP
(2015) Transient measurement of the effective particle density of cigarette smoke. J Aerosol Sci
87:63–74
122. Liu C-N, Awasthi A, Hung Y-H, Tsai C-J (2013) Collection efficiency and interstage loss of nanoparticles
in micro-orifice-based cascade impactors. Atmos
Environ 69:325–333
Airborne Nanoparticles: Control and Detection
131
Précédent

- 148/529

Suivant