Usually, the reaction time for the chemical biodiesel making is shorter than the
biodiesel creation via an enzymatic catalyst.
The results displayed that ethanol provided a greater production of biodiesel in
contrast to methanol (Fig. 1.15).
Although, the difference between the yield of ethanol and methanol was small,
but in terms of cost and economic benefit and advantages such as higher cetane
number, lower cloud points, ethanol can be more attractive as compared to methanol.
Since ethanol would now be able to be delivered from sustainable and ease
farming biomass, along these lines, ethanol biodiesel shows up as a 100% inexhaustible other option (Nasaruddin et al. 2013, 2015).
100
Chicken fat Mutton fat
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
1
2
3
Catalyst (g)
Ester yields (%)
4
5
6
Fig. 1.14 The influence of a catalyst on the yield of biodiesel created (Bhatti et al. 2008)
Fig. 1.15 The influence of various alcohols on biodiesel creation (Nasaruddin et al. 2013)
20
Z. Shahi and M. Khajeh Mehrizi
biodiesel creation via an enzymatic catalyst.
The results displayed that ethanol provided a greater production of biodiesel in
contrast to methanol (Fig. 1.15).
Although, the difference between the yield of ethanol and methanol was small,
but in terms of cost and economic benefit and advantages such as higher cetane
number, lower cloud points, ethanol can be more attractive as compared to methanol.
Since ethanol would now be able to be delivered from sustainable and ease
farming biomass, along these lines, ethanol biodiesel shows up as a 100% inexhaustible other option (Nasaruddin et al. 2013, 2015).
100
Chicken fat Mutton fat
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
1
2
3
Catalyst (g)
Ester yields (%)
4
5
6
Fig. 1.14 The influence of a catalyst on the yield of biodiesel created (Bhatti et al. 2008)
Fig. 1.15 The influence of various alcohols on biodiesel creation (Nasaruddin et al. 2013)
20
Z. Shahi and M. Khajeh Mehrizi
