32
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6.2 Data for loose sand (a) and dense sand (b) fit with a single best-fit curve using averaged R value
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6.3 Least-squares fitting error analysis for loose sand (a) and dense sand (b) with transition velocity ranges identified
Table 6.3 Results of fitting data using a single C and R
Test designation
C
R (N/m
2 )
Chi
2
Calculated terminal penetration depth (m)
Dense Dry OS (1420)
1.04
5.0e5
1.94e-2
0.11
Dense Dry OS (1426)
1.14
5.0e5
3.59e-2
0.10
Loose Dry OS (1427)
0.76
2.5e5
1.65e-2
0.18
Loose Dry OS (1428)
0.72
2.5e5
1.62e-2
0.19
B. Kenneally et al.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6.2 Data for loose sand (a) and dense sand (b) fit with a single best-fit curve using averaged R value
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6.3 Least-squares fitting error analysis for loose sand (a) and dense sand (b) with transition velocity ranges identified
Table 6.3 Results of fitting data using a single C and R
Test designation
C
R (N/m
2 )
Chi
2
Calculated terminal penetration depth (m)
Dense Dry OS (1420)
1.04
5.0e5
1.94e-2
0.11
Dense Dry OS (1426)
1.14
5.0e5
3.59e-2
0.10
Loose Dry OS (1427)
0.76
2.5e5
1.65e-2
0.18
Loose Dry OS (1428)
0.72
2.5e5
1.62e-2
0.19
B. Kenneally et al.