frugality consumption and purchase choices. Technically, the four-factor model
yields a satisfactory fit, as it can be seen in the indices presented in Table (10.6).
The higher variability for the Romanian students suggests a more heterogeneous
set of social and symbolic representations surrounding clothing. We fit a final
structural equation model that explores simple associations between the two sustainable consumption scales – food consumption and clothing. Table (10.7) presents
Fig. 10.3 The intensity of the correlations among items in SCC
Fig. 10.4 The scree plot for the SCC
168
R. Ianole-Călin et al.
yields a satisfactory fit, as it can be seen in the indices presented in Table (10.6).
The higher variability for the Romanian students suggests a more heterogeneous
set of social and symbolic representations surrounding clothing. We fit a final
structural equation model that explores simple associations between the two sustainable consumption scales – food consumption and clothing. Table (10.7) presents
Fig. 10.3 The intensity of the correlations among items in SCC
Fig. 10.4 The scree plot for the SCC
168
R. Ianole-Călin et al.