136 Ingrid Hall
30 https://fr.ccunesco.ca/blogue/2019/11/declaration-nord-americaine-diversitebioculturelle.
31 The place of the Local Communities in this caucus would be interesting to investigate, given the extent to which indigenous peoples predominate, as Friis (2020, p. 60
and thereafter) also notes.
32 The debates surrounding the nature of traditional knowledge, which is the cornerstone of the recognition of IPLC rights in the CBD and the Nagoya Protocol, help
to rethink the opposition between nature and culture. Yet, this was not apparent at
meetings in 2019, undoubtedly due to the context and due to the need to renew the
institutions for IPLC participation within the CBD. On this point, see the discussion
in the introduction to this book.
33 IPBES/4/19 (29 March 2016). Also see this volume, Chapter 1.
34 IPBES/7/10 (22 May 2019), Figure A.1, this book, Chapter 1.
35 ht t p://w w w.fao.org/org a n icag/oa-por t a l/orca-resea rch/resea rch-f ield s/
orca-research-models/orca-holistic-approach/fr/.
36 On this point, the conceptual framework of the IPBES, which is the subject of debate
at the time of writing this chapter, is exemplary (Diaz & allii., 2015).
37 For example, speaking of traditional knowledge but adding a holistic interpretation
to it and making reference to the UNDROP (United Nations Declaration on the
Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas), which is involved
both with cultural heritage and with the intellectual property of indigenous peoples,
helps to create a considerably broader conceptual space (Girard, p.c.).
38 Annex II to decision IPBES-8/1, ( June 2021).
References
Adonis, D. L., & Couch, J. (2018). Ili-based Community Organising: An Igorot
Indigenous Peoples’ Concept for Grassroots Collaboration. Journal of Social Inclusion,
9(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.36251/josi.131
Aubertin, C. (2005). La biodiversité: Une notion en quête de stabilité. In C. Aubertin
(Ed.), Représenter la nature? ONG et biodiversité (pp. 99–122). IRD éditions.
Aubertin, C., & Filoche, G. (2011). The Nagoya Protocol on the Use of Genetic
Resources: One Embodiment of an Endless Discussion. Sustentabilidade Em Debate, 2.
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v2n1.2011.3906
Aubertin, C., Pinton, F., & Boisvert, V. (2007). Les marchés de la biodiversité. IRD éditions.
Bavikatte, S. K. (2014). Stewarding The Earth: Rethinking Property and the Emergence
of Biocultural Rights. In Stewarding the Earth. Oxford University Press. https://oxford.
universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198098669.001.0001/
acprof-9780198098669
Bellier, I. (2015). L’avenir que veulent les peuples autochtones. Stratégies institutionnelles,
mobilisations collectives et force de négociation, à Rio+20. In J. Foyer (Ed.), Regard
croisé sur Rio+20. La modernisation écologique à l’épreuve (pp. 259–280). CNRS éditions.
Blaser, M. (2004). Life Projects: Indigenous Peoples’ Agency and Developement. In M.
Blaser, H. A. Feit, & G. Banks (Eds.), In the Way of Development. Indigenous Peoples,
Life Projects and Globalization (pp. 26–44). ZED Book, International Development
Research Centre.
Blaser, M. (2009). The Threat of the Yrmo: The Political Ontology of a Sustainable
Hunting Program. American Anthropologist, 111(1), 10–20. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01073.x
Blaser, M. (2016). Is Another Cosmopolitics Possible? Cultural Anthropology, 31(4), 545–570.
https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.05
30 https://fr.ccunesco.ca/blogue/2019/11/declaration-nord-americaine-diversitebioculturelle.
31 The place of the Local Communities in this caucus would be interesting to investigate, given the extent to which indigenous peoples predominate, as Friis (2020, p. 60
and thereafter) also notes.
32 The debates surrounding the nature of traditional knowledge, which is the cornerstone of the recognition of IPLC rights in the CBD and the Nagoya Protocol, help
to rethink the opposition between nature and culture. Yet, this was not apparent at
meetings in 2019, undoubtedly due to the context and due to the need to renew the
institutions for IPLC participation within the CBD. On this point, see the discussion
in the introduction to this book.
33 IPBES/4/19 (29 March 2016). Also see this volume, Chapter 1.
34 IPBES/7/10 (22 May 2019), Figure A.1, this book, Chapter 1.
35 ht t p://w w w.fao.org/org a n icag/oa-por t a l/orca-resea rch/resea rch-f ield s/
orca-research-models/orca-holistic-approach/fr/.
36 On this point, the conceptual framework of the IPBES, which is the subject of debate
at the time of writing this chapter, is exemplary (Diaz & allii., 2015).
37 For example, speaking of traditional knowledge but adding a holistic interpretation
to it and making reference to the UNDROP (United Nations Declaration on the
Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas), which is involved
both with cultural heritage and with the intellectual property of indigenous peoples,
helps to create a considerably broader conceptual space (Girard, p.c.).
38 Annex II to decision IPBES-8/1, ( June 2021).
References
Adonis, D. L., & Couch, J. (2018). Ili-based Community Organising: An Igorot
Indigenous Peoples’ Concept for Grassroots Collaboration. Journal of Social Inclusion,
9(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.36251/josi.131
Aubertin, C. (2005). La biodiversité: Une notion en quête de stabilité. In C. Aubertin
(Ed.), Représenter la nature? ONG et biodiversité (pp. 99–122). IRD éditions.
Aubertin, C., & Filoche, G. (2011). The Nagoya Protocol on the Use of Genetic
Resources: One Embodiment of an Endless Discussion. Sustentabilidade Em Debate, 2.
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v2n1.2011.3906
Aubertin, C., Pinton, F., & Boisvert, V. (2007). Les marchés de la biodiversité. IRD éditions.
Bavikatte, S. K. (2014). Stewarding The Earth: Rethinking Property and the Emergence
of Biocultural Rights. In Stewarding the Earth. Oxford University Press. https://oxford.
universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198098669.001.0001/
acprof-9780198098669
Bellier, I. (2015). L’avenir que veulent les peuples autochtones. Stratégies institutionnelles,
mobilisations collectives et force de négociation, à Rio+20. In J. Foyer (Ed.), Regard
croisé sur Rio+20. La modernisation écologique à l’épreuve (pp. 259–280). CNRS éditions.
Blaser, M. (2004). Life Projects: Indigenous Peoples’ Agency and Developement. In M.
Blaser, H. A. Feit, & G. Banks (Eds.), In the Way of Development. Indigenous Peoples,
Life Projects and Globalization (pp. 26–44). ZED Book, International Development
Research Centre.
Blaser, M. (2009). The Threat of the Yrmo: The Political Ontology of a Sustainable
Hunting Program. American Anthropologist, 111(1), 10–20. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01073.x
Blaser, M. (2016). Is Another Cosmopolitics Possible? Cultural Anthropology, 31(4), 545–570.
https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.05