68 M. M. Bugge et al.
Coenen, L., Hansen, T. & Rekers, J. V. (2015). Innovation policy for grand challenges: An economic geography perspective. Geography Compass, 9(9), 483–496.
doi:10.1111/gec3.12231.
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic
Review, 75(2), 332–337.
Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations.
London: Pinter.
European Commission. (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Official
Journal of the European Union.
European Commission. (2016). Study on the Optimised Cascading Use of Wood. Brussels: European Commission.
Fagerberg, J. (2017). Mission (Im)possible? The Role of Innovation (and Innovation Policy)
in Supporting Structural Change and Sustainability Transitions. TIK Working Papers on
Innovation Studies. TIK Centre, University of Oslo. Retrieved from http://ideas.
repec.org/s/tik/inowpp.html.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes:
A multi- level perspective and a case- study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.
doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio- technical systems:
Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory.
Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920.
Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations:
Refining the co- evolutionary multi- level perspective. Technological Forecasting &
Social Change, 72(6), 681–696.
Geels, F. W., & Raven, R. (2006). Non- linearity and expectations in nichedevelopment trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch biogas development
(1973–2003). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 375–392. doi:10.
1080/09537320600777143.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways.
Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.
Gereffi, G., & Lee, J. (2016). Economic and social upgrading in global value chains and
industrial clusters: Why governance matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 25–38.
Gibbon, P., Bair, J. & Ponte, S. (2008). Governing global value chains: An introduction. Economy and Society, 37(3), 315–338.
Greener, I. (2017). Path dependence. In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from:
www.britannica.com/topic/path- dependence.
Gregg, J., Bolwig, S., Hansen, T., Solér, O., Ben Amer- Allam, S., Pladevall Viladecans, J., … Fevolden, A. (2017). Value chain structures that define European cellulosic ethanol production. Sustainability, 9(1), 118.
Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2017). Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents
for biorefineries: The role of micro- level factors for technological innovation
system weaknesses. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(5), 500–513. doi:
10.1080/09537325.2016.1249838.
Huguenin, A., & Jeannerat, H. (2017). Creating change through pilot and demonstration projects: Towards a valuation policy approach. Research Policy, 46(3), 624–635.
Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S. & Klerk, L. (2018). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda.
Research Policy, In Press. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.
Coenen, L., Hansen, T. & Rekers, J. V. (2015). Innovation policy for grand challenges: An economic geography perspective. Geography Compass, 9(9), 483–496.
doi:10.1111/gec3.12231.
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic
Review, 75(2), 332–337.
Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations.
London: Pinter.
European Commission. (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Official
Journal of the European Union.
European Commission. (2016). Study on the Optimised Cascading Use of Wood. Brussels: European Commission.
Fagerberg, J. (2017). Mission (Im)possible? The Role of Innovation (and Innovation Policy)
in Supporting Structural Change and Sustainability Transitions. TIK Working Papers on
Innovation Studies. TIK Centre, University of Oslo. Retrieved from http://ideas.
repec.org/s/tik/inowpp.html.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes:
A multi- level perspective and a case- study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.
doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio- technical systems:
Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory.
Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920.
Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations:
Refining the co- evolutionary multi- level perspective. Technological Forecasting &
Social Change, 72(6), 681–696.
Geels, F. W., & Raven, R. (2006). Non- linearity and expectations in nichedevelopment trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch biogas development
(1973–2003). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 375–392. doi:10.
1080/09537320600777143.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways.
Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.
Gereffi, G., & Lee, J. (2016). Economic and social upgrading in global value chains and
industrial clusters: Why governance matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 25–38.
Gibbon, P., Bair, J. & Ponte, S. (2008). Governing global value chains: An introduction. Economy and Society, 37(3), 315–338.
Greener, I. (2017). Path dependence. In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from:
www.britannica.com/topic/path- dependence.
Gregg, J., Bolwig, S., Hansen, T., Solér, O., Ben Amer- Allam, S., Pladevall Viladecans, J., … Fevolden, A. (2017). Value chain structures that define European cellulosic ethanol production. Sustainability, 9(1), 118.
Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2017). Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents
for biorefineries: The role of micro- level factors for technological innovation
system weaknesses. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(5), 500–513. doi:
10.1080/09537325.2016.1249838.
Huguenin, A., & Jeannerat, H. (2017). Creating change through pilot and demonstration projects: Towards a valuation policy approach. Research Policy, 46(3), 624–635.
Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S. & Klerk, L. (2018). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda.
Research Policy, In Press. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.