43
3 Concerns and Problems in Fisheries and Aquaculture – Exploring Governability
interactions, power is expected to play an important role. In the fi rst place, power
in fl uences what goals are to be established and who sets them. This implies that the
governing system is designed to correspond with the properties of the systems-tobe-governed, the structural features of the governing system, both issues of governance in and of themselves, and the ways these systems interact. It is precisely for
this reason that addressing governability must recognize the limits and opportunities of particular systems rather than expecting them to perform beyond what they
can actually and potentially do.
References
Archeson, J.M. (2006). Institutional failure in resource management. Annual Review of
Anthropology, 35, 117–34.
Brady, M., & Waldo, S. (2009). Fixing problems in fi sheries – Integrating ITQs, CBM and MPAs
in management. Marine Policy, 33, 258–263.
Butcher, J.G. (2004). The closing of the frontier: A history of the marine fi sheries of Southeast
Asia ca 1850–2000. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Christie, P., McCay, B.J., Miller, M.L., Lowe, C., White, A.T., Stof fl e, R., Fluharty, D.L.,
McManus, L.T., Chuenpagdee, R., Pomeroy, C., Suman, D.O., Blount, B.G., Huppert, D.,
Eisma, R.L.V., Oracion, E., Lowry, K., Pollnac, R.B. (2003). Toward developing a complete
understanding: A social science research agenda for marine protected areas. Fisheries,
28(12), 22–26.
Chuenpagdee, R. (2011). A matter of scale: prospects in small-scale fi sheries. In R. Chuenpagdee
(Ed.), Contemporary visions for world small-scale fi sheries (pp. 21–36). Delft: Eburon.
Chuenpagdee, R., Morgan, L.E., Maxwell, S.M., Norse, E.A., Pauly, D. (2003). Shifting gears:
Assessing collateral impacts of fi shing methods in the U.S. waters. Frontiers in Ecology and the
Environment, 1(10), 517–524.
Degnbol, P., & McCay, B.J. (2007). Unintended consequences of ignoring linkages in fi sheries
systems. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64(4), 793–797.
Gilmore, W.S., & Camilius, J.C. (1996). Do your planning processes meet the reality check? Long
Range Planning, 29(6), 869–879.
Hanna, S., & Jentoft, S. (1996). The human use of the environment: An overview of social and
economic dimensions. In S. Hanna, K. Folke, K-G. Mähler, K. Arrow (Eds.), Rights to nature
(pp. 35–55). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Jentoft, S. (2007). Limits of governability: Institutional implications for fi sheries and coastal
governance. Marine Policy, 31, 360–370.
Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem.
Marine Policy, 33, 553–560.
Jentoft, S., & Eide, A. (Eds.). (2011). Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale
fi sheries. Dordrecht: Springer.
Jentoft, S., & McCay, B.J. (1995). User participation in fi sheries management: Lessons drawn
from international experiences. Marine Policy, 19(3), 227–246.
Jentoft, S., Bavinck, M., Johnson, D., Kaleekal, T. (2009). Co-management and legal pluralism:
How an analytical problem becomes an institutional one. Human Organization, 68(1), 27–38.
Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee R., & Pascual-Fernandez, J. (2011) What MPAs are for. On Goal
Formation and Displacement. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54(1), 75–83.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance
for fi sheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
3 Concerns and Problems in Fisheries and Aquaculture – Exploring Governability
interactions, power is expected to play an important role. In the fi rst place, power
in fl uences what goals are to be established and who sets them. This implies that the
governing system is designed to correspond with the properties of the systems-tobe-governed, the structural features of the governing system, both issues of governance in and of themselves, and the ways these systems interact. It is precisely for
this reason that addressing governability must recognize the limits and opportunities of particular systems rather than expecting them to perform beyond what they
can actually and potentially do.
References
Archeson, J.M. (2006). Institutional failure in resource management. Annual Review of
Anthropology, 35, 117–34.
Brady, M., & Waldo, S. (2009). Fixing problems in fi sheries – Integrating ITQs, CBM and MPAs
in management. Marine Policy, 33, 258–263.
Butcher, J.G. (2004). The closing of the frontier: A history of the marine fi sheries of Southeast
Asia ca 1850–2000. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Christie, P., McCay, B.J., Miller, M.L., Lowe, C., White, A.T., Stof fl e, R., Fluharty, D.L.,
McManus, L.T., Chuenpagdee, R., Pomeroy, C., Suman, D.O., Blount, B.G., Huppert, D.,
Eisma, R.L.V., Oracion, E., Lowry, K., Pollnac, R.B. (2003). Toward developing a complete
understanding: A social science research agenda for marine protected areas. Fisheries,
28(12), 22–26.
Chuenpagdee, R. (2011). A matter of scale: prospects in small-scale fi sheries. In R. Chuenpagdee
(Ed.), Contemporary visions for world small-scale fi sheries (pp. 21–36). Delft: Eburon.
Chuenpagdee, R., Morgan, L.E., Maxwell, S.M., Norse, E.A., Pauly, D. (2003). Shifting gears:
Assessing collateral impacts of fi shing methods in the U.S. waters. Frontiers in Ecology and the
Environment, 1(10), 517–524.
Degnbol, P., & McCay, B.J. (2007). Unintended consequences of ignoring linkages in fi sheries
systems. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64(4), 793–797.
Gilmore, W.S., & Camilius, J.C. (1996). Do your planning processes meet the reality check? Long
Range Planning, 29(6), 869–879.
Hanna, S., & Jentoft, S. (1996). The human use of the environment: An overview of social and
economic dimensions. In S. Hanna, K. Folke, K-G. Mähler, K. Arrow (Eds.), Rights to nature
(pp. 35–55). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Jentoft, S. (2007). Limits of governability: Institutional implications for fi sheries and coastal
governance. Marine Policy, 31, 360–370.
Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem.
Marine Policy, 33, 553–560.
Jentoft, S., & Eide, A. (Eds.). (2011). Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale
fi sheries. Dordrecht: Springer.
Jentoft, S., & McCay, B.J. (1995). User participation in fi sheries management: Lessons drawn
from international experiences. Marine Policy, 19(3), 227–246.
Jentoft, S., Bavinck, M., Johnson, D., Kaleekal, T. (2009). Co-management and legal pluralism:
How an analytical problem becomes an institutional one. Human Organization, 68(1), 27–38.
Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee R., & Pascual-Fernandez, J. (2011) What MPAs are for. On Goal
Formation and Displacement. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54(1), 75–83.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance
for fi sheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.