The Effect of Fractures on the Reclamation of NAPL
77
9OOO~
7000
6000
0.1
Fig.9(a) N w versus K fO
10
K fO
~ -0- .. Nse=1; Nm=O.S
.. _[} .. N5e=3.5; Nm=O.S
.. -b- .. Nse=6; Nm=O.S
.. -0' .. Nse=11: Nm=O.S
--+-- Nse=1; Nm=5
________ Nse=3.5; Nm=5
------4---- NSF6; Nm=5
_____ Nse=11: Nm=5
Fig. 9(b) NT versus K fO
100
4000,---------------------------------~------------------,
I
3000 ~
{;>,
_ -0- _ N .... 1; Nm=~'5
_ -0 _ N .... 3.5; Nm=0.5
.. -f:r .. Nse=6; Nm--o.S
.. w()o .. Nse=i1: Nm=O.S I
2500j
"
I
"
-----+-- Nse=1; Nm=5
__________ N5e=3.5; Nm=5
2000j
--A--- Nse=6; Nm=5
::1 ','
_. Nse=11: Nm=5
~f~~~;~~:i;:;::::ii~~~i:: :~<'~~,~ii::: ;:;~ ::: ; ; •
0.1
10
100
K fO
Fig. 9a,b. Influence of surfactant additives. a Treated volume versus KjO. b
Comparative reclamation time versus KjO