76
H. Rubin et al.
25000
20000
.
15000
it
:z:
10000
. .
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
-:z: 2000
1500
1000
500
0.1
Fig.8(a) N w versus K,o
.
.
K,o
Fig. 8(b) NT versus K to
•
.... "...
" ..
... , '" ..
. - v - J=O:N~o~~1
•• & _ J-l. Nm-0.5
II
_ -[} • J=I.5; Nm=0.5
•
~ -<)0 ~ J=3; Nm=O.S
..... J=0.5; Nm=5
-----.~J=1; Nm=5
____ --- J=1.S; Nm=5
-+-__ J=3; Nm=5
_ -0- _ J=0.5; Nm=0.5
_ -0- _ J=1; Nm=O.5
• _j"<, _ J=I.5; Nm=0.5
_ -c- _ J=3; Nm=O.5
-----+-- J=O.5; Nm=5
_
J=I;Nm=5
~J=1.5; Nm=5
___ J=3; Nm=5
"-'::~
-------~.~~~ .........
........ "tJ _ _
-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ....... _ _
":0.:: :.::~:~:~:~~~~::::::::::::::::: :t
10
100
K'D
Fig. Sa,b. Influence of changing the aquifer flow rate. a Treated volume versus
KjO. b Comparative reclamation time versus KjO