212
EricJ. Warrant
Land MF ( 1999) Compound eye structure: Matching eye to environment. In: Archer
SN, Djamgoz MBA, Loew ER, Partridge JC, Vallerga S (eds). Adaptive
Mechanisms in the Ecology of Vision. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
Boston, London, pp 51-71
Land MF, Burton FA, Meyer-Rochow VB (1979) The optical geometry of euphausiid
eyes. J Comp Physiol 130: 49-62
Land MF, Eckert H (1985) Maps of the acute zones of flies. J Comp Physiol A 156:
525-538
Land MF, Gibson G, Horwood J ( 1997) Mosquito eye design: conical rhabdoms are
matched to wide aperture lenses. Proc R Soc Lond B 264: 1183-1187
Land MF, Gibson G, Horwood J, Zeil J (1999) Fundamental differences in the optical
structure of the eyes of nocturnal and diurnal mosquitoes. J Comp Physiol A 185:
91-103
Layne J, Land MF, Zeil J (1997) Fiddler crabs use the visual horizon to distinguish
predators from conspecifics: a review of the evidence. J Mar Bioi Assoc UK 77:
43-54
Lillywhite PG, Laughlin SB (1979) Transducer noise in a photoreceptor. Nature
277: 569-572
Mcintyre PD, Caveney S ( 1998) Superposition optics and the time of flight in onitine
dung beetles. J Comp Physiol A 183: 45-60
Melzer RR, Zimmermann T, Smola U (1997) Modification ofbranched photoreceptor
axons, and the evolution of neural superposition. Cell Mol Life Sci 53: 242-247
Nilsson D-E (1988) A new type of imaging optics in compound eyes. Nature 332:
76-78
Nilsson D-E ( 1989) Optics and evolution of the compound eye. In: Stavenga DG,
Hardie RC (eds) Facets ofVision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3073
Nilsson D-E, Nilsson HL (1981) A crustacean compound eye adapted for low light
intensities (Isopoda). J Comp Physiol143: 503-510
Nilsson D-E, Ro A-1 (1994) Did neural pooling for night vision lead to the evolution
of neural superposition eyes? J Comp Physiol A 175: 289-302
Nilsson D-E, Gislen L, Brannstrom PA (2000) Principles and constraints in the design
of superposition eyes. J Comp Physiol A, in press
Olberg R (1981) Object- and self-movement detectors in the ventral cord of the
dragonfly. J Comp Physiol A 141: 327-334
Olberg R (1986) Identified target-selective visual intemeurons descending from the
dragonfly brain. J Comp Physiol A 159: 827-840
Schwind R ( 1978) Visual system of Notonecta glauca: a neuron sensitive to movement
in the binocular visual field. J Comp Physiol123: 315-328
Schwind R (1980) Geometrical optics of the Notonecta eye: adaptations to optical
environment and way oflife. J Comp Physiol140: 59-68
Sherk TE (1978) Development of the compound eyes of dragonflies (Odonata). III.
Adult compound eyes. J Exp Zool203: 61-80
Snyder AW (1977) Acuity of compound eyes: physical limitations and design. J
Comp Physiol 116: 161-182
EricJ. Warrant
Land MF ( 1999) Compound eye structure: Matching eye to environment. In: Archer
SN, Djamgoz MBA, Loew ER, Partridge JC, Vallerga S (eds). Adaptive
Mechanisms in the Ecology of Vision. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
Boston, London, pp 51-71
Land MF, Burton FA, Meyer-Rochow VB (1979) The optical geometry of euphausiid
eyes. J Comp Physiol 130: 49-62
Land MF, Eckert H (1985) Maps of the acute zones of flies. J Comp Physiol A 156:
525-538
Land MF, Gibson G, Horwood J ( 1997) Mosquito eye design: conical rhabdoms are
matched to wide aperture lenses. Proc R Soc Lond B 264: 1183-1187
Land MF, Gibson G, Horwood J, Zeil J (1999) Fundamental differences in the optical
structure of the eyes of nocturnal and diurnal mosquitoes. J Comp Physiol A 185:
91-103
Layne J, Land MF, Zeil J (1997) Fiddler crabs use the visual horizon to distinguish
predators from conspecifics: a review of the evidence. J Mar Bioi Assoc UK 77:
43-54
Lillywhite PG, Laughlin SB (1979) Transducer noise in a photoreceptor. Nature
277: 569-572
Mcintyre PD, Caveney S ( 1998) Superposition optics and the time of flight in onitine
dung beetles. J Comp Physiol A 183: 45-60
Melzer RR, Zimmermann T, Smola U (1997) Modification ofbranched photoreceptor
axons, and the evolution of neural superposition. Cell Mol Life Sci 53: 242-247
Nilsson D-E (1988) A new type of imaging optics in compound eyes. Nature 332:
76-78
Nilsson D-E ( 1989) Optics and evolution of the compound eye. In: Stavenga DG,
Hardie RC (eds) Facets ofVision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3073
Nilsson D-E, Nilsson HL (1981) A crustacean compound eye adapted for low light
intensities (Isopoda). J Comp Physiol143: 503-510
Nilsson D-E, Ro A-1 (1994) Did neural pooling for night vision lead to the evolution
of neural superposition eyes? J Comp Physiol A 175: 289-302
Nilsson D-E, Gislen L, Brannstrom PA (2000) Principles and constraints in the design
of superposition eyes. J Comp Physiol A, in press
Olberg R (1981) Object- and self-movement detectors in the ventral cord of the
dragonfly. J Comp Physiol A 141: 327-334
Olberg R (1986) Identified target-selective visual intemeurons descending from the
dragonfly brain. J Comp Physiol A 159: 827-840
Schwind R ( 1978) Visual system of Notonecta glauca: a neuron sensitive to movement
in the binocular visual field. J Comp Physiol123: 315-328
Schwind R (1980) Geometrical optics of the Notonecta eye: adaptations to optical
environment and way oflife. J Comp Physiol140: 59-68
Sherk TE (1978) Development of the compound eyes of dragonflies (Odonata). III.
Adult compound eyes. J Exp Zool203: 61-80
Snyder AW (1977) Acuity of compound eyes: physical limitations and design. J
Comp Physiol 116: 161-182