138
M.T.K
i
• Arroyo et al.
30 - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
a
• • •
.:. ~.
: . . .fIt· •• , •
•
(r = 0.166, N.S.)
•
•
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
0-+---,---,--,------r---,---..-----,-----1
25
Latitude COS)
30 - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
(r = 0.639, P < 0.01)
•
b
•
•
• •
..- ••
• •
.... •
•
•
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
O-+-----,--..,...-----,--,-----,--------r---,-------j
25
Latitude CON)
Figure 8.2. Relationship between latitude and annual temperature range for
coastal stations in Chile and the Pacific Northwest. (a) Chile, temperature range
based on means of coldest and warmest months. (b) Pacific Northwest, temperature range based on means of coldest and warmest months. (c) Chile: tern-