77
Comparative Analysis of Surface Energy Balance Models
acquisition dates (especially for DOYs 163 and 204) that were characterized again by
a higher atmospheric demand and an early stage in vegetation growth.
A partial explanation of this behavior can be found in the magnitude of the fluxes
modeled by TSEB. For the first acquisition (DOY 163), the RE index inadequately
described the results due to the extremely low value returned by TSEB (about
5.0
MAD (mm day –1
)
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
–1.0
5.0
MAD (mm day –1
)
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
–1.0
5.0
MAD (mm day –1
)
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
–1.0
5.0
MAD (mm day –1
)
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
–1.0
C1
C2
O
V1
V2
ALL
C1
C2
O
V1
V2
ALL
C1
C2
O
V1
V2
ALL
C1
C2
O
V1
V2
ALL
C1
C2
O
V1
V2
ALL
C1
C2
O
V1
V2
ALL
C1
C2
O
V1
V2
ALL
C1
C2
O
V1
V2
ALL
DOY 163
DOY 185
DOY 204
DOY 235
DOY 247
SEBAL
S-SEBI
DOY 284
DOY 295
Mean
Field
Field
FIGURE 4.8  Bar plots showing MAD values in correspondence of the five analyzed fields
and for the whole scene (ALL) in each acquisition and for the entire period (Mean).