114
3 Non-geometry standards
Table 3.8. (cont.)
Feafuie OperatIon
21
Name:
22
Feature Attribute Names:
23
Object Feature Type Names:
24
Definition:
25
Formal Definition:
Feature Attribute
31
Name:
32
Definition:
33
Code:
34
Value Data Type:
35
Value Measurement Unit:
36
Value Domain Type:
37
Value Domain:
Feature Attribute
31
Name:
32
Definition:
33
Code:
34
Value Data Type:
35
Value Measurement Unit:
36
Value Domain Type:
37
Value Domain:
Feature Attribute Value
38
Label:
39
Code:
40
Definition:
Feature Association
41
Name:
42
Inverse Relationship:
43
Definition:
44
Code:
45
Feature Types Included:
46
Order Indicator:
47
Cardinality:
48
Constraints:
49
RoleName:
Opening periods
Bridge availability
Road
Road c10sed if bridge is c10sed
Bridge availability
Status for the ordinary use
2001
Boolean
Bridge category
Type of transportation facility supported
2002
Character
1 ("enumerated")
1 Generic/unknown
10
1 not applicable or
1 impossible to determine
Above-under condition
1 Road
1 1
1
1
Other features below the bridge
1 Pedestrian
12
1 pedestrians only
1
Guarantees that the bridge is always above the other features
3001
Stream
o ("not ordered")
1 : ? = "One or more"
3.4.3 Data dictionary registers (ISO 19126)
The ISO 19126 (Profiles for feature data dietionary registers and feature eatalogue
registers) is a profile of the ISO 19110 and is a data dietionary deseribing the set of
features and attributes that may be used to ereate a feature eatalogue.
The ISO 19126 standardises the feature eatalogue ofthe digital geographie information domain of the military in NATO eountries, in partieular the Feature and Attribute Coding Catalogue (FACC). The Digital Geographie Information Working
Group (DGIWG) ofNATO maintains it.
The ISO 19126 is linked to other standards ofthe ISO 19100 family, in partieular
to the ISO 19135 (Proeedures for registration of geographieal information items) and
to the ISO 19106 (Profiles). The ISO 19126 may serve as a guide for other information eommunities to develop other eompatible registers that may work in a system of
authoritative refereneing.
3 Non-geometry standards
Table 3.8. (cont.)
Feafuie OperatIon
21
Name:
22
Feature Attribute Names:
23
Object Feature Type Names:
24
Definition:
25
Formal Definition:
Feature Attribute
31
Name:
32
Definition:
33
Code:
34
Value Data Type:
35
Value Measurement Unit:
36
Value Domain Type:
37
Value Domain:
Feature Attribute
31
Name:
32
Definition:
33
Code:
34
Value Data Type:
35
Value Measurement Unit:
36
Value Domain Type:
37
Value Domain:
Feature Attribute Value
38
Label:
39
Code:
40
Definition:
Feature Association
41
Name:
42
Inverse Relationship:
43
Definition:
44
Code:
45
Feature Types Included:
46
Order Indicator:
47
Cardinality:
48
Constraints:
49
RoleName:
Opening periods
Bridge availability
Road
Road c10sed if bridge is c10sed
Bridge availability
Status for the ordinary use
2001
Boolean
Bridge category
Type of transportation facility supported
2002
Character
1 ("enumerated")
1 Generic/unknown
10
1 not applicable or
1 impossible to determine
Above-under condition
1 Road
1 1
1
1
Other features below the bridge
1 Pedestrian
12
1 pedestrians only
1
Guarantees that the bridge is always above the other features
3001
Stream
o ("not ordered")
1 : ? = "One or more"
3.4.3 Data dictionary registers (ISO 19126)
The ISO 19126 (Profiles for feature data dietionary registers and feature eatalogue
registers) is a profile of the ISO 19110 and is a data dietionary deseribing the set of
features and attributes that may be used to ereate a feature eatalogue.
The ISO 19126 standardises the feature eatalogue ofthe digital geographie information domain of the military in NATO eountries, in partieular the Feature and Attribute Coding Catalogue (FACC). The Digital Geographie Information Working
Group (DGIWG) ofNATO maintains it.
The ISO 19126 is linked to other standards ofthe ISO 19100 family, in partieular
to the ISO 19135 (Proeedures for registration of geographieal information items) and
to the ISO 19106 (Profiles). The ISO 19126 may serve as a guide for other information eommunities to develop other eompatible registers that may work in a system of
authoritative refereneing.