Références
1. Abers [2004] : E. Abers, Quantum mechanics, Pearson Education, New Jersey.
2. Abramowitz et Stegun [1964] : M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun eds., Handbook
of mathematical functions,D o v e r ,N e w - Y o r k .
3. Ahmad et al. [2001] : Q. Ahmad et al., (SNO Collaboration), Interactions produced by B
8 solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys.Rev.
Lett. 87, 071301.
4. Akitt [1992] : J.W. Akitt, NMR chemistry, an introduction to modern NMR
spectroscopy, Chapman&Hall, New-York.
5. Anandan [1992] : J. Anandan, The geometric phase, Nature 360, 307.
6. Arndt et al. [1999] : M. Arndt, O. Nairz, J. Vos-Andreae, C. Keller, G. van
der Zouw and A. Zeilinger, Wave-particle duality of C60 molecules, Nature
401, 680 (1999).
7. Arndt et al. [2005] : M. Arndt, K. Hornberger and A. Zeilinger, Probing the limits of the quantum world, Physics World 18, March 2005,
pp. 35–40.
8. Aspect [1999] : A. Aspect, Bell’s inequalities : more ideal than ever, Nature
398, 189-190.
9. Aspect et al. [1982] : A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Experimental
realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen gedanken experiment : a new violation
of Bell’s inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982) ; A. Aspect, J. Dalibard,
and G. Roger, Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time varying
analyzers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1804 (1982).
10. Aspect et al. [1989] : A. Aspect, P. Grangier et G. Roger, Dualité ondecorpuscule pour un photon unique, J. Optics (Paris) 20, 119.
11. Badurek et al. [1985] : G. Badurek, H. Rauch and D. Tuppinger, Neutron
interferometric double-resonance experiment, Phys. Rev. A34, 2600-2608.
12. Balian [1991] : R. Balian, From Microphysics to Macrophysics, Springer,
Berlin.
13. Ballentine [1990] : L. Ballentine, Limitations of the projection postulate,
Found. Phys. 20, 1329.
14. Ballentine [1998] : L. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics, World Scientific.
1. Abers [2004] : E. Abers, Quantum mechanics, Pearson Education, New Jersey.
2. Abramowitz et Stegun [1964] : M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun eds., Handbook
of mathematical functions,D o v e r ,N e w - Y o r k .
3. Ahmad et al. [2001] : Q. Ahmad et al., (SNO Collaboration), Interactions produced by B
8 solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys.Rev.
Lett. 87, 071301.
4. Akitt [1992] : J.W. Akitt, NMR chemistry, an introduction to modern NMR
spectroscopy, Chapman&Hall, New-York.
5. Anandan [1992] : J. Anandan, The geometric phase, Nature 360, 307.
6. Arndt et al. [1999] : M. Arndt, O. Nairz, J. Vos-Andreae, C. Keller, G. van
der Zouw and A. Zeilinger, Wave-particle duality of C60 molecules, Nature
401, 680 (1999).
7. Arndt et al. [2005] : M. Arndt, K. Hornberger and A. Zeilinger, Probing the limits of the quantum world, Physics World 18, March 2005,
pp. 35–40.
8. Aspect [1999] : A. Aspect, Bell’s inequalities : more ideal than ever, Nature
398, 189-190.
9. Aspect et al. [1982] : A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Experimental
realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen gedanken experiment : a new violation
of Bell’s inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982) ; A. Aspect, J. Dalibard,
and G. Roger, Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time varying
analyzers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1804 (1982).
10. Aspect et al. [1989] : A. Aspect, P. Grangier et G. Roger, Dualité ondecorpuscule pour un photon unique, J. Optics (Paris) 20, 119.
11. Badurek et al. [1985] : G. Badurek, H. Rauch and D. Tuppinger, Neutron
interferometric double-resonance experiment, Phys. Rev. A34, 2600-2608.
12. Balian [1991] : R. Balian, From Microphysics to Macrophysics, Springer,
Berlin.
13. Ballentine [1990] : L. Ballentine, Limitations of the projection postulate,
Found. Phys. 20, 1329.
14. Ballentine [1998] : L. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics, World Scientific.