9.3.3
Drought Resilience Projects as Social Interaction
Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
9.4 Governance Assessment: Actor Coherence Saves the Day . . . . 191
9.4.1
Extent: Are All Elements in the Five Dimensions
that Are Relevant for the Sector or Project
that Is Focused on Taken into Account? . . . . . . . . . . 191
9.4.2
Coherence: Are the Elements in the Dimensions
of Governance Reinforcing Rather than
Contradicting Each Other? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
9.4.3
Flexibility: Are Multiple Roads to the Goals,
Depending on Opportunities and Threats as they
Arise, Permitted and Supported? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
9.4.4
Intensity: How Strongly Do the Elements
in the Dimensions of Governance Urge Changes
in the Status Quo or in Current Developments? . . . . . 195
9.4.5
Overview and Visualization of the Results
of the Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
9.5 A Tale of Preserving Voluntary Action and Upscaling
Nonetheless: Conclusions and Recommendations
for the Region Twente. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
9.5.1
Overall Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
9.5.2
Awareness and Public Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
9.5.3
Inter-collegial Exchange and Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
9.5.4
From Farm Level Approach to Full Area Level
Approach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
9.5.5
Creating a Long-Term Outlook and a Vision
for Each Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
10 Cross-cutting Perspective on Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
Gül Özerol and Jenny Troeltzsch
10.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
10.2 Drought and Water Scarcity Problems Related
to Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
10.3 Drought Issues and Competing Sectors’ Risks
for Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
10.4 Multilevel Interactions Regarding Agricultural Measures . . . . . 209
10.5 Public and Political Awareness on Agricultural
Effects of Drought . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
10.6 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
Contents
xv
Drought Resilience Projects as Social Interaction
Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
9.4 Governance Assessment: Actor Coherence Saves the Day . . . . 191
9.4.1
Extent: Are All Elements in the Five Dimensions
that Are Relevant for the Sector or Project
that Is Focused on Taken into Account? . . . . . . . . . . 191
9.4.2
Coherence: Are the Elements in the Dimensions
of Governance Reinforcing Rather than
Contradicting Each Other? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
9.4.3
Flexibility: Are Multiple Roads to the Goals,
Depending on Opportunities and Threats as they
Arise, Permitted and Supported? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
9.4.4
Intensity: How Strongly Do the Elements
in the Dimensions of Governance Urge Changes
in the Status Quo or in Current Developments? . . . . . 195
9.4.5
Overview and Visualization of the Results
of the Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
9.5 A Tale of Preserving Voluntary Action and Upscaling
Nonetheless: Conclusions and Recommendations
for the Region Twente. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
9.5.1
Overall Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
9.5.2
Awareness and Public Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
9.5.3
Inter-collegial Exchange and Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
9.5.4
From Farm Level Approach to Full Area Level
Approach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
9.5.5
Creating a Long-Term Outlook and a Vision
for Each Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
10 Cross-cutting Perspective on Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
Gül Özerol and Jenny Troeltzsch
10.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
10.2 Drought and Water Scarcity Problems Related
to Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
10.3 Drought Issues and Competing Sectors’ Risks
for Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
10.4 Multilevel Interactions Regarding Agricultural Measures . . . . . 209
10.5 Public and Political Awareness on Agricultural
Effects of Drought . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
10.6 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
Contents
xv