(Table 27.2). Greater than 90 % recovery was obtained for both I
À and IO 3
À spiked
samples in the first trap. This result suggested that the chemical species of I in the
traps was I
À regardless of the initial chemical species.
27.5 Conclusion
To analyze
129
I in the contaminated water from FDNPS, separation of I from
radionuclides such as
137 Cs and
90 Sr using Anion-SR and measurement by DRCICP-MS are convenient and effective. As a solution condition, a diluted HCl
solution of pH 2 with reductant was required to analyze inorganic iodine species
using Anion-SR.
To analyze
129 I in tree samples from FDNPS, a combustion method is suitable.
Both I
À and IO 3
À were vaporized by combustion and trapped in the 2 % TMAH
solution as I
À with high recovery (>89 %). Anomalous combustion was avoided by
the stepwise and slow temperature increase in the range from 100
to 300
C.
Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
References
1. Tigeras A, Bachet M, Catalette H, Simoni E (2011) Prog Nucl Energy 53:504–515
2. Tanaka K, Yasuda M, Watanabe K, Hoshi A, Higuchi H, Kameo Y (2013) Proceedings of the
14th workshop on environmental radioactivity, Tsukuba, pp 17–26
3. Shimada A, Sakatani K, Kameo Y, Takahashi K. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. Accepted for
publication
4. Tanaka K, Shimada A, Hoshi A, Yasuda M, Ozawa M, Kameo Y (2014) J Nucl Sci Technol
51(7–8):1032–1043
5. Ishimori K, Haraga T, Shimada A, Kameo Y, Takahashi K (2010) Ibaraki (Japan): Japan
Atomic Energy Agency; JAEA-technology 2010–016 (Japanese)
6. Toyama C, Muramatsu Y, Uchida Y, Igarashi Y, Aoyama M, Matsuzaki H (2012) J Environ
Radioact 113:0116–0122
7. Kameo Y, Ishimori K, Shimada A, Takahashi K (2012) Bunseki Kagaku 61(10):845–849
8. Hou X, Povinec PP, Zhang L, Shi K, Biddulph D, Chang C-C, Fan Y, Golser R, Hou Y,
Jeskovsky M, Tim Jull AJ, Liu Q, Luo M, Steier P, Zhou W (2013) Environ Sci Technol
47:3091–3098
Table 27.2 Recovered I (μg)
in the traps by the combustion
method
Sample
Trap 1
Trap 2
Trap 3
1 g pine bark
0.29
0.052
0.025
1 g pine bark + 50 μg I (I
À
)
45
0.030
0.004
1 g pine bark + 50 μg I (IO 3
À )
52
0.070
0.017
27 Development of a Rapid Analytical Method. . .
317
À and IO 3
À spiked
samples in the first trap. This result suggested that the chemical species of I in the
traps was I
À regardless of the initial chemical species.
27.5 Conclusion
To analyze
129
I in the contaminated water from FDNPS, separation of I from
radionuclides such as
137 Cs and
90 Sr using Anion-SR and measurement by DRCICP-MS are convenient and effective. As a solution condition, a diluted HCl
solution of pH 2 with reductant was required to analyze inorganic iodine species
using Anion-SR.
To analyze
129 I in tree samples from FDNPS, a combustion method is suitable.
Both I
À and IO 3
À were vaporized by combustion and trapped in the 2 % TMAH
solution as I
À with high recovery (>89 %). Anomalous combustion was avoided by
the stepwise and slow temperature increase in the range from 100
to 300
C.
Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
References
1. Tigeras A, Bachet M, Catalette H, Simoni E (2011) Prog Nucl Energy 53:504–515
2. Tanaka K, Yasuda M, Watanabe K, Hoshi A, Higuchi H, Kameo Y (2013) Proceedings of the
14th workshop on environmental radioactivity, Tsukuba, pp 17–26
3. Shimada A, Sakatani K, Kameo Y, Takahashi K. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. Accepted for
publication
4. Tanaka K, Shimada A, Hoshi A, Yasuda M, Ozawa M, Kameo Y (2014) J Nucl Sci Technol
51(7–8):1032–1043
5. Ishimori K, Haraga T, Shimada A, Kameo Y, Takahashi K (2010) Ibaraki (Japan): Japan
Atomic Energy Agency; JAEA-technology 2010–016 (Japanese)
6. Toyama C, Muramatsu Y, Uchida Y, Igarashi Y, Aoyama M, Matsuzaki H (2012) J Environ
Radioact 113:0116–0122
7. Kameo Y, Ishimori K, Shimada A, Takahashi K (2012) Bunseki Kagaku 61(10):845–849
8. Hou X, Povinec PP, Zhang L, Shi K, Biddulph D, Chang C-C, Fan Y, Golser R, Hou Y,
Jeskovsky M, Tim Jull AJ, Liu Q, Luo M, Steier P, Zhou W (2013) Environ Sci Technol
47:3091–3098
Table 27.2 Recovered I (μg)
in the traps by the combustion
method
Sample
Trap 1
Trap 2
Trap 3
1 g pine bark
0.29
0.052
0.025
1 g pine bark + 50 μg I (I
À
)
45
0.030
0.004
1 g pine bark + 50 μg I (IO 3
À )
52
0.070
0.017
27 Development of a Rapid Analytical Method. . .
317