202
Peters, G., & Hertwich, E. (2008a). Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: Production versus
consumption. Climatic Change, 86 , 51–66.
Peters, G., & Hertwich, E. (2008b). CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for
global climate policy. Environmental Science & Technology, 42 , 1401–1407.
Peters, G. P., Minx, J. C., Weber, C. L., & Edenhofer, O. (2011). Growth in emission transfers via
international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America, 108 (21), 8903–8908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006388108 .
Pullinger, M. (2014). Working time reduction policy in a sustainable economy: Criteria and options
for its design. Ecological Economics, 103 , 11–19.
Rosnick, D., & Weisbrot, M. (2007). Are shorter work hours good for the environment? A comparison of US and European energy consumption. International Journal of Health Services, 37 ,
405–417.
Shove, E. (2012). Putting practice into policy: Reconfi guring questions of consumption and climate change. Contemporary Social Science, 9 , 415–429.
Shui, B., & Harriss, R. C. (2006). The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade. Energy Policy,
34 , 4063.
Smith, A. (1904). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, library of economics and liberty . Retrieved March 16, 2015, from http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/
smWN18.html
Soper, K. (2008). Alternative hedonism, cultural theory and the role of aesthetic revisioning.
Cultural Studies, 22 , 567–587.
Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy
savings from improved energy effi ciency . London: UK Energy Research Centre.
The Living Wage Commission. (2014). Work that pays: The fi nal report of the Living Wage
Commission . [Online]. Retrieved March 29, 2015, from http://livingwagecommission.org.uk/
wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Work-that-pays_The-Final-Report-of-The-Living-WageCommission_w-4.pdf
Thomas, B. A., & Azevedo, I. L. (2013). Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S.
households with input-output analysis part 1: Theoretical framework. Ecological Economics,
86 , 199–210.
Tukker, A. (2006). Identifying priorities for environmental product policy. Journal of Industrial
Ecology, 10 , 1.
Tukker, A., & Jansen, B. (2006). Environmental impacts of products: A detailed review of studies.
Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10 , 159.
Tukker, A., Cohen, M. J., Hubacek, K., & Mont, O. (2010). The impacts of household consumption and options for change. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14 , 13–30.
UN. (2011). Classifi cation of Individual Consumption According to Purpose (COICOP) [Online].
Retrieved March 29, 2015, from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/iiss/Classifi cation-of-IndividualConsumption-According-to-Purpose-COICOP.ashx
Victor, P. (2008). Managing without growth: Slower by design, not disaster . Cheltenham/
Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2008). Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of
American household carbon footprint. Ecological Economics, 66 , 379–391.
Weber, C., & Perrels, A. (2000). Modelling lifestyle effects on energy demand and related emissions. Energy Policy, 28 , 549.
Weber, C. L., & Peters, G. P. (2009). Climate change policy and international trade: Policy considerations in the US. Energy Policy, 37 , 432–440.
Wiedmann, T. (2009). A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumptionbased emission and resource accounting. Ecological Economics, 69 , 211–222.
Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2007). A defi nition of ‘carbon footprint’. In C. C. Pertsova (Ed.),
Ecological economics research trends (pp. 1–11). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.
Wier, M., Lenzen, M., Munksgaard, J., & Smed, S. (2001). Effects of household consumption patterns on CO2 requirements. Economic Systems Research, 13 , 259–274.
A. Druckman and T. Jackson
Peters, G., & Hertwich, E. (2008a). Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: Production versus
consumption. Climatic Change, 86 , 51–66.
Peters, G., & Hertwich, E. (2008b). CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for
global climate policy. Environmental Science & Technology, 42 , 1401–1407.
Peters, G. P., Minx, J. C., Weber, C. L., & Edenhofer, O. (2011). Growth in emission transfers via
international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America, 108 (21), 8903–8908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006388108 .
Pullinger, M. (2014). Working time reduction policy in a sustainable economy: Criteria and options
for its design. Ecological Economics, 103 , 11–19.
Rosnick, D., & Weisbrot, M. (2007). Are shorter work hours good for the environment? A comparison of US and European energy consumption. International Journal of Health Services, 37 ,
405–417.
Shove, E. (2012). Putting practice into policy: Reconfi guring questions of consumption and climate change. Contemporary Social Science, 9 , 415–429.
Shui, B., & Harriss, R. C. (2006). The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade. Energy Policy,
34 , 4063.
Smith, A. (1904). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, library of economics and liberty . Retrieved March 16, 2015, from http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/
smWN18.html
Soper, K. (2008). Alternative hedonism, cultural theory and the role of aesthetic revisioning.
Cultural Studies, 22 , 567–587.
Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy
savings from improved energy effi ciency . London: UK Energy Research Centre.
The Living Wage Commission. (2014). Work that pays: The fi nal report of the Living Wage
Commission . [Online]. Retrieved March 29, 2015, from http://livingwagecommission.org.uk/
wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Work-that-pays_The-Final-Report-of-The-Living-WageCommission_w-4.pdf
Thomas, B. A., & Azevedo, I. L. (2013). Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S.
households with input-output analysis part 1: Theoretical framework. Ecological Economics,
86 , 199–210.
Tukker, A. (2006). Identifying priorities for environmental product policy. Journal of Industrial
Ecology, 10 , 1.
Tukker, A., & Jansen, B. (2006). Environmental impacts of products: A detailed review of studies.
Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10 , 159.
Tukker, A., Cohen, M. J., Hubacek, K., & Mont, O. (2010). The impacts of household consumption and options for change. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14 , 13–30.
UN. (2011). Classifi cation of Individual Consumption According to Purpose (COICOP) [Online].
Retrieved March 29, 2015, from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/iiss/Classifi cation-of-IndividualConsumption-According-to-Purpose-COICOP.ashx
Victor, P. (2008). Managing without growth: Slower by design, not disaster . Cheltenham/
Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2008). Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of
American household carbon footprint. Ecological Economics, 66 , 379–391.
Weber, C., & Perrels, A. (2000). Modelling lifestyle effects on energy demand and related emissions. Energy Policy, 28 , 549.
Weber, C. L., & Peters, G. P. (2009). Climate change policy and international trade: Policy considerations in the US. Energy Policy, 37 , 432–440.
Wiedmann, T. (2009). A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumptionbased emission and resource accounting. Ecological Economics, 69 , 211–222.
Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2007). A defi nition of ‘carbon footprint’. In C. C. Pertsova (Ed.),
Ecological economics research trends (pp. 1–11). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.
Wier, M., Lenzen, M., Munksgaard, J., & Smed, S. (2001). Effects of household consumption patterns on CO2 requirements. Economic Systems Research, 13 , 259–274.
A. Druckman and T. Jackson