198
References
Aall, C., Klepp, I. G., Engeset, A. B., Skuland, S. E., & Stoa, E. (2011). Leisure and sustainable
development in Norway: Part of the solution and the problem. Leisure Studies, 30 , 453–476.
Ahmad, N., & Wyckoff, A. (2003). Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade of
goods . Paris: OECD.
Alfredsson, E. C. (2004). “Green” consumption–no solution for climate change. Energy, 29 ,
513–524.
Andrew, R., Davis, S. J., & Peters, G. (2013). Climate policy and dependence on traded carbon.
Environmental Research Letters , 8 (3). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034011 .
Atkinson, G., Hamilton, K., Ruta, G., & Van Der Mensbrugghe, D. (2011). Trade in ‘virtual carbon’: Empirical results and implications for policy. Global Environmental Change, 21 ,
563–574.
Baiocchi, G., & Minx, J. (2010). Understanding changes in the UK’s CO2 emissions: A global
perspective. Environmental Science and Technology, 44 , 1177–1184.
Baiocchi, G., Minx, J., & Hubacek, K. (2010). The impact of social factors and consumer behavior
on carbon dioxide emissions in the United Kingdom. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14 , 50–72.
Barr, S., Shaw, G., Coles, T., & Prillwitz, J. (2010). ‘A holiday is a holiday’: Practicing sustainability, home and away. Journal of Transport Geography, 18 , 474–481.
Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75 , 493–517.
Benders, R. M. J., Moll, H. C., & Nijdam, D. S. (2012). From energy to environmental analysis.
Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16 , 163–175.
Bin, S., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2005). Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related
CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 33 , 197–208.
Birnik, A. (2013). An evidence-based assessment of online carbon calculators. International
Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 17 , 280–293.
Bows, A., & Barrett, J. (2010). Cumulative emission scenarios using a consumption-based
approach: A glimmer of hope? Future Science, 1 , 161–175.
Brännlund, R., Ghalwash, T., & Nordström, J. (2007). Increased energy effi ciency and the rebound
effect: Effects on consumption and emissions. Energy Economics, 29 , 1–17.
Buchs, M., & Schnepf, S. V. (2013). Who emits most? Associations between socio-economic factors and UK households’ home energy, transport, indirect and total CO2 emissions. Ecological
Economics, 90 , 114–123.
Caeiro, S., Ramos, T. B., & Huisingh, D. (2012). Procedures and criteria to develop and evaluate
household sustainable consumption indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 27 , 72–91.
Caprariello, P. A., & Reis, H. T. (2012). To do, to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 104 , 199.
Cave, L. A., & Blomquist, G. C. (2008). Environmental policy in the European Union: Fostering
the development of pollution havens? Ecological Economics, 65 , 253.
CCC. (2013). Reducing the UK’s carbon footprint and managing competitiveness risks . London:
Committee on Climate Change.
Chitnis, M., Sorrell, S., Druckman, A., Firth, S. K., & Jackson, T. (2013). Turning lights into
fl ights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Policy, 55 ,
234–250.
Chitnis, M., Sorrell, S., Druckman, A., Firth, S. K., & Jackson, T. (2014). Who rebounds most?
Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups.
Ecological Economics, 106 , 12–32.
Collins English Dictionary. (2012). Carbon footprint . Retrieved March 29, 2015, from http://www.
collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/carbon-footprint
Cooper, T. (2010). Longer lasting products: Alternatives to the throwaway society . Farnham:
Surrey, UK.
A. Druckman and T. Jackson
Précédent

- 217/373

Suivant