251
In Il Governo della Città nella Contemporaneità: La città come motore di
sviluppo (pp. 187–189). Rome: Edizioni INU, Salerno.
Pearce, J. M. (2002). Photovoltaics: A path to sustainable futures. Futures,
34(7), 663–674.
Wilson, J. P., & Gallant, J. C. (Eds.). (2000). Terrain analysis – Principles and
Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6 About the effects of local scale regulations and sprawl and about the relationship between
administrative fragmentation and sprawl increase, see: Pendall R. (1999), “Do Land-Use
Controls Cause Sprawl?”, Environment and Planning B, vol. 26/4, pp. 555–571.
7 Between the various studies, see Ewing R., Pendall R., and Chen D. (2002), Measuring
Sprawl and Its Impact, Smart Growth America/U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C.
(continued)
Focus C: Urban Sprawl and Measures for Environmental
Sustainability
Laura Fregolent
Department of Design and Planning in Complex Environments,
IUAV University of Venice,
S.Croce, 1957, 30135, Venice, Italy
laura.fregolent@iuav.it
Keywords Urban sprawl, Urban growth, Carbon dioxide emissions, Welfare
policies
Urban Sprawl: Characteristics and Impacts
The contemporary city has increasingly been characterised by certain distinctive features, in particular by a progressive urban fragmentation and by a
polarisation and specialisation of some functions and services outside the
urban centres, which resulted in a growing increase of mobility.
The phenomenon, known as urban sprawl, is generalised and extended and
has been studied extensively in its social, economic, cultural, political and
institutional components
6 as well as in its causes, impacts,
7 formal expressions and local specificities, which have led to different manifestations of the
phenomenon according to the different territorial and geographical contexts.
8 Mitigation of and Adaptation to UHI Phenomena: The Padua Case Study
Précédent

- 295/444

Suivant