83
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
01:00
03:00
05:00
07:00
09:00
11:00
13:00
15:00
17:00
19:00
21:00
23:00
∆θ [K]
TIME
SCENARIO 1
SCENARIO 2
SCENARIO 3
SCENARIO 4
Fig. 3.12 Temperature difference between the base case and four mitigation scenarios in the
course of a reference summer day in Padua
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
01:00
03:00
05:00
07:00
09:00
11:00
13:00
15:00
17:00
19:00
21:00
23:00
∆θ [K]
TIME
SCENARIO 1
SCENARIO 2
Fig. 3.13 Temperature difference between the base case and two mitigation scenarios in the
course of a reference summer day in Warsaw
3 Methodologies for UHI Analysis
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
01:00
03:00
05:00
07:00
09:00
11:00
13:00
15:00
17:00
19:00
21:00
23:00
∆θ [K]
TIME
SCENARIO 1
SCENARIO 2
SCENARIO 3
SCENARIO 4
Fig. 3.12 Temperature difference between the base case and four mitigation scenarios in the
course of a reference summer day in Padua
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
01:00
03:00
05:00
07:00
09:00
11:00
13:00
15:00
17:00
19:00
21:00
23:00
∆θ [K]
TIME
SCENARIO 1
SCENARIO 2
Fig. 3.13 Temperature difference between the base case and two mitigation scenarios in the
course of a reference summer day in Warsaw
3 Methodologies for UHI Analysis
