5 An Overview of the Integrated Flood Analysis System (IFAS) …
81
Table 5.1
(continued)
No
Catchment
Area (km 2
)
Rainfall type
Calibration (%)
Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency
Reference
Peak flow
Volume
Calibration
Validation
9
Bang Giang river
basin
4,200
Ground
−13.6–57.6%
0.44–0.93
Chinh et al. (2014)
10
Citarum Hulu
River basin,
Indonesia
1,771
Ground
0.51
Bormudoi et al.
(2011)
11
Indragiri, Riau
7467
Ground
10.01%
1.3
1.83
Hendra et al. (2015)
Satellite
(corrected)
0.1%
0.52
2.15
12
Pua, sub-basin of
Nan River basin,
Thailand
404
Ground
−5.2%
Chuenchooklin and
Pangnakorn (2015)
13
Chindwin river
basin
27,420
Ground
62%
Fukami and Herath
(2009)
Satellite
−9.65%
14
Shijyushida Dam
river basin
1196
Ground
< 10%
Sugiura et al. (2008)
Kakogawa River
basin (Oshima)
1291
Ground
< 10%
81
Table 5.1
(continued)
No
Catchment
Area (km 2
)
Rainfall type
Calibration (%)
Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency
Reference
Peak flow
Volume
Calibration
Validation
9
Bang Giang river
basin
4,200
Ground
−13.6–57.6%
0.44–0.93
Chinh et al. (2014)
10
Citarum Hulu
River basin,
Indonesia
1,771
Ground
0.51
Bormudoi et al.
(2011)
11
Indragiri, Riau
7467
Ground
10.01%
1.3
1.83
Hendra et al. (2015)
Satellite
(corrected)
0.1%
0.52
2.15
12
Pua, sub-basin of
Nan River basin,
Thailand
404
Ground
−5.2%
Chuenchooklin and
Pangnakorn (2015)
13
Chindwin river
basin
27,420
Ground
62%
Fukami and Herath
(2009)
Satellite
−9.65%
14
Shijyushida Dam
river basin
1196
Ground
< 10%
Sugiura et al. (2008)
Kakogawa River
basin (Oshima)
1291
Ground
< 10%