18 Bridging the Vulnerability Paradigm to Critical Infrastructure …
351
Fig. 18.7 Flood hazard contagion potential (Out-degree centrality)
References
CalFire (2018c) Top 20 most destructive California wildfires. http://www.fire.ca.gov/communica
tions/downloads/fact_sheets/Top20_Destruction.pdf
Adger WN (2005) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309(5737):1036–1039.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1112122
Ager AA, Palaiologou P, Evers CR, Day MA, Barros AMG (2018) Assessing transboundary wildfire
exposure in the Southwestern United States: transboundary wildfire exposure in the Southwestern
United States. Risk Anal 38(10):2105–2127. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12999
Alderson DL (2019) Overcoming barriers to greater scientific understanding of critical infrastructure
resilience. In: Ruth M, Goessling-Reisemann S (eds) Handbook on resilience of socio-technical
systems, pp 66–88. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439376.00010
Ayyub BM (2014) Systems resilience for Multihazard environments: definition, metrics, and
valuation for decision making: systems resilience for Multihazard environments. Risk Anal
34(2):340–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12093
Barabási A-L (2016) Network science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Belles J (2017) 2017 Atlantic Hurricane season recap: 17 moments we’ll never forget. The
Weather Channel. https://weather.com/storms/hurricane/news/2017-11-11-moments-hurricaneseason-atlantic-irma-maria-harvey/
Berkhout F (2012) Adaptation to climate change by organizations: adaptation to climate change by
organizations. Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 3(1):91–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.154
Blaikie P, Cannon R, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk. Routledge, New York, NY
Bodin Ö (2017) Collaborative environmental governance: achieving collective action in socialecological systems. Science 357(6352):eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114
Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational
patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Change 19(3):366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glo
envcha.2009.05.002
351
Fig. 18.7 Flood hazard contagion potential (Out-degree centrality)
References
CalFire (2018c) Top 20 most destructive California wildfires. http://www.fire.ca.gov/communica
tions/downloads/fact_sheets/Top20_Destruction.pdf
Adger WN (2005) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309(5737):1036–1039.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1112122
Ager AA, Palaiologou P, Evers CR, Day MA, Barros AMG (2018) Assessing transboundary wildfire
exposure in the Southwestern United States: transboundary wildfire exposure in the Southwestern
United States. Risk Anal 38(10):2105–2127. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12999
Alderson DL (2019) Overcoming barriers to greater scientific understanding of critical infrastructure
resilience. In: Ruth M, Goessling-Reisemann S (eds) Handbook on resilience of socio-technical
systems, pp 66–88. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439376.00010
Ayyub BM (2014) Systems resilience for Multihazard environments: definition, metrics, and
valuation for decision making: systems resilience for Multihazard environments. Risk Anal
34(2):340–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12093
Barabási A-L (2016) Network science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Belles J (2017) 2017 Atlantic Hurricane season recap: 17 moments we’ll never forget. The
Weather Channel. https://weather.com/storms/hurricane/news/2017-11-11-moments-hurricaneseason-atlantic-irma-maria-harvey/
Berkhout F (2012) Adaptation to climate change by organizations: adaptation to climate change by
organizations. Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 3(1):91–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.154
Blaikie P, Cannon R, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk. Routledge, New York, NY
Bodin Ö (2017) Collaborative environmental governance: achieving collective action in socialecological systems. Science 357(6352):eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114
Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational
patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Change 19(3):366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glo
envcha.2009.05.002