304
M. A. M. N. Lotpy et al.
Specimen No.1
Deformation: 2030.62 μm
Specimen No. 2
Deformation: 542.25 μm
Specimen No. 3
Deformation: 1056.45 μm
Specimen No. 4
Deformation: 1804.06 μm
Specimen No. 5
Deformation: 830.02 μm
Specimen No.6
Deformation: 2456.6 μm
Specimen No. 7
Deformation: 2262.73 μm
Specimen No. 8
Deformation: 1258.22 μm
Specimen No. 9
Deformation: 2019.97 μm
Fig. 28.5 Measurement of deformation due to different welding parameters
Table 28.3 Experimental
results
Specimen number Deformation (µm) Signal to noise ratio
1
2030.62
−66.153
2
542.25
−54.684
3
1056.45
−60.477
4
1804.06
−65.125
5
830.02
−58.382
6
2456.60
−67.807
7
2262.73
−67.093
8
1258.22
−61.995
9
2019.97
−66.107
M. A. M. N. Lotpy et al.
Specimen No.1
Deformation: 2030.62 μm
Specimen No. 2
Deformation: 542.25 μm
Specimen No. 3
Deformation: 1056.45 μm
Specimen No. 4
Deformation: 1804.06 μm
Specimen No. 5
Deformation: 830.02 μm
Specimen No.6
Deformation: 2456.6 μm
Specimen No. 7
Deformation: 2262.73 μm
Specimen No. 8
Deformation: 1258.22 μm
Specimen No. 9
Deformation: 2019.97 μm
Fig. 28.5 Measurement of deformation due to different welding parameters
Table 28.3 Experimental
results
Specimen number Deformation (µm) Signal to noise ratio
1
2030.62
−66.153
2
542.25
−54.684
3
1056.45
−60.477
4
1804.06
−65.125
5
830.02
−58.382
6
2456.60
−67.807
7
2262.73
−67.093
8
1258.22
−61.995
9
2019.97
−66.107
