526
M. Abhay et al.
Fig. 4 Pressure variation
7 Results
Figures 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 show the results for blunt double conic configuration.
Variation in temperature along the symmetry line is given in Fig. 5 for chemically
and non-chemically reactive cases. Higher values of temperature in the shock region
can be observed for chemically reactive gases as compared to non-reactive gas and
are in the range of 16,000 to 17,000 K for this case. Temperature pallet for the same
is given in Fig. 6, where a small region of thick shock wave can be seen. Figures 7, 8,
9 and 10 show the variation in heat-flux, pressure, shear stress and drag, respectively
on the wall of the configuration. Addition of chemical reactions shows reduction in
heat-flux, pressure and shear stress. Drag (Fig. 10), remains the same for both cases
as very small variation in pressure and shear forces is observed.
Fig. 5 Variation in
temperature along the length
of domain
M. Abhay et al.
Fig. 4 Pressure variation
7 Results
Figures 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 show the results for blunt double conic configuration.
Variation in temperature along the symmetry line is given in Fig. 5 for chemically
and non-chemically reactive cases. Higher values of temperature in the shock region
can be observed for chemically reactive gases as compared to non-reactive gas and
are in the range of 16,000 to 17,000 K for this case. Temperature pallet for the same
is given in Fig. 6, where a small region of thick shock wave can be seen. Figures 7, 8,
9 and 10 show the variation in heat-flux, pressure, shear stress and drag, respectively
on the wall of the configuration. Addition of chemical reactions shows reduction in
heat-flux, pressure and shear stress. Drag (Fig. 10), remains the same for both cases
as very small variation in pressure and shear forces is observed.
Fig. 5 Variation in
temperature along the length
of domain