systematically; and (c) the ability to resolve conflicts peacefully without violence. Such characters
are necessary for citizens in the digital age. The development of information, communication,
and technology is one of the causes of the world revolution (Waters in Sunarto 2004). That is the
importance of rebuilding noble morals for young citizens in the digital era.
4 CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
Digital citizenship in Indonesia needs to be upgraded to digital etiquette and digital law competencies toward good and intelligent digital citizens. The strategy was undertaken to realize it through
the power of groups in social media “who controls social media, he controls the world”. The implications of this research are to reconstruct the rules (UU ITE) in the usage and users of social media
and the appropriate education model for digital citizens. It focuses on freedom of opinion, which
still has multiple interpretations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Gratitude is given to the Directorate of Research and Community Service of Telkom University
who provided facilities that helped in the research process. Contributions from each author—first
author: research conduct and design early writing; second author: writing language and content.
REFERENCES
Bernier, A. 2008. Making Space for Young Adults: Three Stages Toward Success. Montreal: San Jose State
University.
Buckingham, D. 2000. The Making of Citizens: Young People, News and Politics. London and New
York: Routledge.
Budimansyah, D. 2008. Membangun Karakter Bangsa Di Tengah Arus Globalisasi dan Gerakan Demokratisasi: Reposisi Peran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Inauguration speech of Professor of Civic Education,
Social Studies, IKIP, Bandung.
Budimansyah, D. and Suryadi, K. 2008. PKn dan Masyarakat Multikultural. Bandung: Study Program of
Civic Education, Graduate School Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Chapman, J.A. and Robertson, M. 2015. Youth Leisure, Places, Spaces and Identity. New York.
Cloudry et al. 2013. Digital citizenship? Narrative exchange and the changing terms of civic culture.
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ccst20
Cogan, J.J. 1998. Citizenship for the 21 Century: An International Perspective on Education. London: Cogan
Page.
Djahiri, A.K. 2006. Esensi Pendidikan Nilai Moral dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di Era Globalisasi.
Bandung: Civic Education Laboratory, Faculty of Social Studies, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Komalasari, K. 2009. The Effect of Contextual Learning in Civic Education on Students’ Civic Competence.
Journal of Social Sciences 5(4):261–270.
Komalasari, K. (2017). Value-Based Interactive Multimedia Development through Integrated Practice for the
Formation of Students’ Character. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 16(4).
Machfiroh, R. 2016. Digital Citizenship. Research final report: Telkom University.
Machfiroh, R. et al. 2017. The 2nd International Conference on Sociology Education. DOI: 10.5220/
0007107408730877
Saripudin, D. and Komalasari K. 2015. Living Values Education in School’s Habituation Program and Its Effect
on Student’s Character Development. The New Educational Review 39:51–62.
Van Dijk. 2015. Presentation on Sharing Session at Directorate of Research and Community Service, Telkom
University, August 13, 2015.
359
are necessary for citizens in the digital age. The development of information, communication,
and technology is one of the causes of the world revolution (Waters in Sunarto 2004). That is the
importance of rebuilding noble morals for young citizens in the digital era.
4 CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
Digital citizenship in Indonesia needs to be upgraded to digital etiquette and digital law competencies toward good and intelligent digital citizens. The strategy was undertaken to realize it through
the power of groups in social media “who controls social media, he controls the world”. The implications of this research are to reconstruct the rules (UU ITE) in the usage and users of social media
and the appropriate education model for digital citizens. It focuses on freedom of opinion, which
still has multiple interpretations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Gratitude is given to the Directorate of Research and Community Service of Telkom University
who provided facilities that helped in the research process. Contributions from each author—first
author: research conduct and design early writing; second author: writing language and content.
REFERENCES
Bernier, A. 2008. Making Space for Young Adults: Three Stages Toward Success. Montreal: San Jose State
University.
Buckingham, D. 2000. The Making of Citizens: Young People, News and Politics. London and New
York: Routledge.
Budimansyah, D. 2008. Membangun Karakter Bangsa Di Tengah Arus Globalisasi dan Gerakan Demokratisasi: Reposisi Peran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Inauguration speech of Professor of Civic Education,
Social Studies, IKIP, Bandung.
Budimansyah, D. and Suryadi, K. 2008. PKn dan Masyarakat Multikultural. Bandung: Study Program of
Civic Education, Graduate School Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Chapman, J.A. and Robertson, M. 2015. Youth Leisure, Places, Spaces and Identity. New York.
Cloudry et al. 2013. Digital citizenship? Narrative exchange and the changing terms of civic culture.
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ccst20
Cogan, J.J. 1998. Citizenship for the 21 Century: An International Perspective on Education. London: Cogan
Page.
Djahiri, A.K. 2006. Esensi Pendidikan Nilai Moral dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di Era Globalisasi.
Bandung: Civic Education Laboratory, Faculty of Social Studies, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Komalasari, K. 2009. The Effect of Contextual Learning in Civic Education on Students’ Civic Competence.
Journal of Social Sciences 5(4):261–270.
Komalasari, K. (2017). Value-Based Interactive Multimedia Development through Integrated Practice for the
Formation of Students’ Character. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 16(4).
Machfiroh, R. 2016. Digital Citizenship. Research final report: Telkom University.
Machfiroh, R. et al. 2017. The 2nd International Conference on Sociology Education. DOI: 10.5220/
0007107408730877
Saripudin, D. and Komalasari K. 2015. Living Values Education in School’s Habituation Program and Its Effect
on Student’s Character Development. The New Educational Review 39:51–62.
Van Dijk. 2015. Presentation on Sharing Session at Directorate of Research and Community Service, Telkom
University, August 13, 2015.
359