Theor Chem Acc (2015) 134:123
1 3
order might be relevant. Here the comparison between theory and experiment can be carried out on a higher level in
order to fi nd out whether there are effects that cannot be
accounted for.
The Green’s operator procedure was primarily developed for investigating static problems, but it has recently
been demonstrated that also dynamical processes, such as
scattering processes or transitions between atomic states,
are governed by the Green’s operator and can be handled
by a similar procedure [ 20 ].
Acknowledgments The authors want to congratulate Peter Surjan
to his 60th birthday, and I.L. wants in particular to thank Peter for
his hospitality during several visits to Budapest. This work has been
fi nancially supported by the Helmholtz Association and the Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung under the project VH-NG-421.
References
1. Lindgren I, Morrison J (1986) Atomic many-body theory, 2nd
edn. Springer, Berlin reprinted 2009
2. Lindgren I, Salomonson S, Åsén B (2004) Phys Rep 389:161
3. Lindgren I, Salomonson S, Hedendahl D (2010) Recent progress
coupled cluster methods: theory and applications. In: Čársky P,
Paldus J, Pittner J (eds) Springer, New York, pp 357–374
4. Lindgren I (2011) Relativistic many-body theory: a new fi eldtheoretical approach. Springer, New York
5. Holmberg J, Salomonson S, Lindgren I (2015) Phys Rev A
92:012509
6. Bloch C (1958) Nucl Phys 6/7:329/451
7. Lindgren I (1974) J Phys B 7:2441
8. Hedendahl D (2010) Ph.D. thesis, University of Gothenburg,
Gothenburg, Sweden
9. Hedendahl D, Holmberg J (2012) Phys Rev A 85:012514
10. Snyderman NJ (1991) Ann Phys (NY) 211:43
11. Artemyev AN, Shabaev VM, Yerokhin VA (1997) Phys Rev A
56:3529
12. Sunnergren P (1998) Ph.D. thesis, Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg,
Gothenburg, Sweden
13. Adkins G (1983) Phys Rev D 27:1814
14. Adkins G (1986) Phys Rev D 34:2489
15. Artemyev AN, Shabaev VM, Yerokhin VA, Plunien G, Soff G
(2005) Phys Rev A 71:062104
16. Plante DR, Johnson WR, Sapirstein J (1994) Phys Rev A
49:3519
17. Chantler CT et al (2012). arXiv-ph0988193
18. Chantler CT (2012) Phys Rev Lett 109:153001
19. Kubic̆ ek K, Mokler PH, Mäckel V, Ullrich J, López-Urrutia JC
(2014) PRA 90:032508
20. Lindgren I, Salomonson S, Holmberg J (2014) Phys Rev A
89:062504
7
Reprinted from the journal
1 3
order might be relevant. Here the comparison between theory and experiment can be carried out on a higher level in
order to fi nd out whether there are effects that cannot be
accounted for.
The Green’s operator procedure was primarily developed for investigating static problems, but it has recently
been demonstrated that also dynamical processes, such as
scattering processes or transitions between atomic states,
are governed by the Green’s operator and can be handled
by a similar procedure [ 20 ].
Acknowledgments The authors want to congratulate Peter Surjan
to his 60th birthday, and I.L. wants in particular to thank Peter for
his hospitality during several visits to Budapest. This work has been
fi nancially supported by the Helmholtz Association and the Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung under the project VH-NG-421.
References
1. Lindgren I, Morrison J (1986) Atomic many-body theory, 2nd
edn. Springer, Berlin reprinted 2009
2. Lindgren I, Salomonson S, Åsén B (2004) Phys Rep 389:161
3. Lindgren I, Salomonson S, Hedendahl D (2010) Recent progress
coupled cluster methods: theory and applications. In: Čársky P,
Paldus J, Pittner J (eds) Springer, New York, pp 357–374
4. Lindgren I (2011) Relativistic many-body theory: a new fi eldtheoretical approach. Springer, New York
5. Holmberg J, Salomonson S, Lindgren I (2015) Phys Rev A
92:012509
6. Bloch C (1958) Nucl Phys 6/7:329/451
7. Lindgren I (1974) J Phys B 7:2441
8. Hedendahl D (2010) Ph.D. thesis, University of Gothenburg,
Gothenburg, Sweden
9. Hedendahl D, Holmberg J (2012) Phys Rev A 85:012514
10. Snyderman NJ (1991) Ann Phys (NY) 211:43
11. Artemyev AN, Shabaev VM, Yerokhin VA (1997) Phys Rev A
56:3529
12. Sunnergren P (1998) Ph.D. thesis, Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg,
Gothenburg, Sweden
13. Adkins G (1983) Phys Rev D 27:1814
14. Adkins G (1986) Phys Rev D 34:2489
15. Artemyev AN, Shabaev VM, Yerokhin VA, Plunien G, Soff G
(2005) Phys Rev A 71:062104
16. Plante DR, Johnson WR, Sapirstein J (1994) Phys Rev A
49:3519
17. Chantler CT et al (2012). arXiv-ph0988193
18. Chantler CT (2012) Phys Rev Lett 109:153001
19. Kubic̆ ek K, Mokler PH, Mäckel V, Ullrich J, López-Urrutia JC
(2014) PRA 90:032508
20. Lindgren I, Salomonson S, Holmberg J (2014) Phys Rev A
89:062504
7
Reprinted from the journal