5.3 Case Studies for Determining the Potential of Renewable Hydrogen …
81
Table 5.10 Hydrogen demand per production process in Mt y −1
Country
Japan China Korea Taiwan Australia Total per process
Ammonia production
-
10,10 -
–
0,23
10,33
Methanol production
–
8,87
–
–
0,01
8,88
Oil refining
0,68
2,82
0,69
0,30
0,10
4,59
Carbon abated BF-OF
steel manufacturing
process (option 1)
2,09
20,82 1,27
0,40
0,10
24,68
DRI-EAF steel
manufacturing process
(incl. recycled share)
(option 2)
2,85
37,23 1,56
0,56
0,15
42,36
Total per country with
steel manufacturing
option 1
2,77
42,60 1,97
0,70
0,45
48,49
Total per country with
steel manufacturing
option 2
3,54
59,02 2,25
0,86
0,49
66,16
5.3.3 Determining the Potential for Decarbonisation
The determination of the decarbonisation potential is done by calculating the offset of CO 2 emissions if the hydrogen used in the industrial process is produced
from water electrolysis powered by renewable electricity.
As identified in the literature review, the CO 2 emissions offset depends on the
fossil fuel-based hydrogen production processes. The SMR process releases 12
kg of CO 2 per kg of hydrogen produced while the coal gasification releases 27
kg of CO 2 per g of hydrogen produced (Simons and Bauer 2011).
In the oil refining sector, hydrogen is also produced as a by-product of steam
naphtha reforming (catalytic reforming) process. The CO 2 emissions of steam
naphtha reforming (catalytic reforming) is of 10,5 kg per kg of hydrogen produced
(EPA 2008). A portion of the hydrogen used in oil refining is also purchased. This
merchant hydrogen for oil refining is assumed to be produced from SMR in the
calculations.
Précédent

- 90/118

Suivant