References
69
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in
research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
Hanna, P. (2012). Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: A research
note. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 239–242.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of
partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Hemming, P. J. (2008). Mixing qualitative research methods in children’s geographies. Area, 40(2),
152–162.
Hooley, T., Wellens, J., & Marriott, J. (2012). What is online research? Using the internet for social
science research. London and New York: A&C Black.
Krauss, S. E. (2005). Research paradigms and meaning making: A primer. The Qualitative Report,
10(4), 758–770.
Lapadat, J. C. (2000). Problematizing transcription: Purpose, paradigm and quality. International
Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(3), 203–219.
Lapadat, J. C., & Lindsay, A. C. (1999). Transcription in research and practice: From standardization
of technique to interpretive positionings. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(1), 64–86.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions,
and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4, 97–128.
Macdonald, D., Kirk, D., Metzler, M., Nilges, L. M., Schempp, P., & Wright, J. (2002). It’s all
very well, in theory: Theoretical perspectives and their applications in contemporary pedagogical
research. Quest, 54(2), 133–156.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational researcher, 17(2), 13–17.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a
shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis. Oaks, CA, USA:
Sage.
Nairn, K., Munro, J., & Smith, A. B. (2005). A counter-narrative of a ‘failed’interview. Qualitative
Research, 5(2), 221–244.
Oliver, D. G., Serovich, J. M., & Mason, T. L. (2005). Constraints and opportunities with interview
transcription: Towards reflection in qualitative research. Social Forces, 84(2), 1273–1289.
Parker, I. (2013). Discourse analysis: Dimensions of critique in psychology. Qualitative Research
in Psychology, 10(3), 223–239.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential
perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of
Management Review, 29(4), 635–652.
Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,
16(2), 175–196.
Pillow, W. S. (2010). Dangerous reflexivity: Rigour, responsibility and reflexivity in qualitative
research. The Routledge doctoral students companion: Getting to grips with research in education
and social sciences (pp. 270–282). London: Routledge.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities.
Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(4), 281–307.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1994). Analyzing discourse. Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 47–66).
London: Routledge.
Scheurich, J. J. (1995). A postmodernist critique of research interviewing. International Journal of
Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(3), 239–252.
Sims-Schouten, W., Riley, S. C. E., & Willig, C. (2007). Critical realism in discourse analysis: A
presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women’s talk of motherhood, childcare
and female employment as an example. Theory & Psychology, 17(1), 127–150.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data.
American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
69
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in
research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
Hanna, P. (2012). Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: A research
note. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 239–242.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of
partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Hemming, P. J. (2008). Mixing qualitative research methods in children’s geographies. Area, 40(2),
152–162.
Hooley, T., Wellens, J., & Marriott, J. (2012). What is online research? Using the internet for social
science research. London and New York: A&C Black.
Krauss, S. E. (2005). Research paradigms and meaning making: A primer. The Qualitative Report,
10(4), 758–770.
Lapadat, J. C. (2000). Problematizing transcription: Purpose, paradigm and quality. International
Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(3), 203–219.
Lapadat, J. C., & Lindsay, A. C. (1999). Transcription in research and practice: From standardization
of technique to interpretive positionings. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(1), 64–86.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions,
and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4, 97–128.
Macdonald, D., Kirk, D., Metzler, M., Nilges, L. M., Schempp, P., & Wright, J. (2002). It’s all
very well, in theory: Theoretical perspectives and their applications in contemporary pedagogical
research. Quest, 54(2), 133–156.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational researcher, 17(2), 13–17.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a
shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis. Oaks, CA, USA:
Sage.
Nairn, K., Munro, J., & Smith, A. B. (2005). A counter-narrative of a ‘failed’interview. Qualitative
Research, 5(2), 221–244.
Oliver, D. G., Serovich, J. M., & Mason, T. L. (2005). Constraints and opportunities with interview
transcription: Towards reflection in qualitative research. Social Forces, 84(2), 1273–1289.
Parker, I. (2013). Discourse analysis: Dimensions of critique in psychology. Qualitative Research
in Psychology, 10(3), 223–239.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential
perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of
Management Review, 29(4), 635–652.
Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,
16(2), 175–196.
Pillow, W. S. (2010). Dangerous reflexivity: Rigour, responsibility and reflexivity in qualitative
research. The Routledge doctoral students companion: Getting to grips with research in education
and social sciences (pp. 270–282). London: Routledge.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities.
Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(4), 281–307.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1994). Analyzing discourse. Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 47–66).
London: Routledge.
Scheurich, J. J. (1995). A postmodernist critique of research interviewing. International Journal of
Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(3), 239–252.
Sims-Schouten, W., Riley, S. C. E., & Willig, C. (2007). Critical realism in discourse analysis: A
presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women’s talk of motherhood, childcare
and female employment as an example. Theory & Psychology, 17(1), 127–150.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data.
American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.