68
5 Methodology
Chapter 7, I explore the discourses the participants drew on when discussing social
investment, and relate these to the guideline documents. In Chapter 8, I examine the
participants’ recommendations for social investment practices, and how these relate
to the discourses of social investment addressed in Chapters 7 and 8.
References
Allan, R. N. (2009). Virtual research environments: From portals to science gateways. New Delphi:
Elsevier.
Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links
between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117.
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative
research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brockington, D., & Sullivan, S. (2003). Qualitative research. In R. Scheyvens & D.
Storey (Eds.), Development fieldwork: A practical guide (pp. 57–74). London, UK: Sage. ISBN
9780761948902.
Christians, C. G. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln
(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139–164). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. New York:
Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among
five approaches. London: Sage.
D’Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., & Melendez, S. (2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for
social work: A critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 73–90.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. London, UK:
Sage.
DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education,
40(4), 314–321.
Dowling, M. (2006). Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 13(3),
7–21.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse
analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217.
Fairclough, N. (2001). The discourse of new labour: Critical discourse analysis. Discourse as data:
A guide for analysis, 1, 229–266.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London:
Longman.
Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. Discourse studies.
In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 357–378). London: Sage.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In
N. K Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (sid. 645l672). London:
Sage.
Foucault, M. (1970). The archaeology of knowledge. International Social Science Council, 9(1),
175–185.
Grant, B. M., & Giddings, L. S. (2002). Making sense of methodologies: A paradigm framework
for the novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse, 13(1), 10–28.
Grønnerød, J. S. (2004). On the meanings and uses of laughter in research interviews relationships
between interviewed men and a woman interviewer. Young, 12(1), 31–49.
Précédent

- 87/170

Suivant