Recent Advances in the Chemistry and Pharmacology of Cryptolepine
185
Fig. 11 Derivatives of 1
S
N
41 (S-isostere of 1)
I
N
S
I
42
N
N
43 (2,7-dibromocryptolepine)
Br
Br
N
N
44 (11-(piperidin-4-ylamino)-crytolepine)
HN
NH
45
N
H
N
Br
H
N
O
N
N
R 1
R 2
N
46 R 1 = Br or I, R 2 = H, Br, or I
(42), several were equipotent to or more potent than fluconazole and amphotericin B
against Cryptococcus neoformans as well as several other opportunistic pathogens.
The most potents were an analog in which the benzyl group of 42 was p-chlorosubstituted and another in which the benzyl group was replaced with a naphthyl
substituent. In addition, comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) was used as
a tool to aid the design of new active analogs [19]. In another study, an extract of
C. sanguinolena root in addition to isolated cryptolepine (1) were moderately active
against Campylobacter sp. (MIC = 6.25–25 μg/cm
3 ) [20].
5 Anticholinesterase and β-Amyloid Effects
Cryptolepine (1) and 2-bromocryptolepine have been shown to be potent (IC 50 <
100 nM), non-competitive inhibitors of both acetyl- and butyryl-cholinesterases
(BACE) [21]. In addition, both compounds decreased the formation of toxic amyloidβ oligomers (via inhibition of BACE) and increased amyloid-β clearance (via Pglycoprotein induction) in vitro, suggesting that cryptolepine analogs may potentially
be of interest as leads to new drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.
Précédent

- 192/210

Suivant