18 The Ultrasonic Treatment as a Promising Method of Nanosized Oxide. . .
309
2. Zhao S, Li J, Wang L, Wang X (2010) Degradation of Rhodamine B and Safranin-T by
MoO 3 :CeO 2 nanofibers and air using a continuous mode. Clean (Weinh) 38(3):268–274
3. Sobhani-Nasab A, Maddahfar M, Hosseinpour-Mashkani SM (2016) Ce(MoO 4 ) 2 nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, and its photocatalyst application through the ultrasonic
method. J Mol Liq 216:1–5
4. Mohamed MM, Katib SMA (2005) Structural and catalytic characteristics of MoO 3 /CeO 2
catalysts: CO oxidation activity. Appl Catal A Gen 287(2):236–243
5. Chang H, Jong MT, Wang C, Qu R, Du Y, Li J, Hao J (2013) Design strategies for P-containing
fuels adaptable CeO 2 −MoO 3 catalysts for DeNO x : significance of phosphorus resistance and
N 2 selectivity. Environ Sci Technol 47(20):11692–11699
6. Zhu J, Gao F, Dong L, Yu W, Qi L, Wang Z, Dong L, Chen Y (2010) Studies on surface
structure of M x O y /MoO 3 /CeO 2 system (M = Ni, Cu, Fe) and its influence on SCR of NO by
NH 3 . Appl Catal B Environ 95(1–2):144–152
7. Yoshitake H, Aoki Y, Hemmi S (2006) Mesoporous titania supported-molybdenum catalyst:
the formation of a new mesophase and use in ethanol-oxygen catalytic reactions. Microporous
Mesoporous Mater 93(1–3):294–303
8. Yang J-I, Lee D-W, Lee J-H, Hyun JC, Lee K-Y (2000) Selective and high catalytic activity of
Cs n H 4−n PMo 11 VO 40 (n≥3) for oxidation of ethanol. Appl Catal A Gen 194-195:123–127
9. Gonçalves FM, Medeiros PRS, Appel LG (2001) The role of cerium in the oxidation of ethanol
over SnO 2 -supported molybdenum oxides. Appl Catal A Gen 208(1–2):265–270
10. Eckert M, Fleischmann G, Jira R, Bolt HM, Golka K (2006) Acetaldehyde,
in: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a01_031.pub2
11. Li M, Wu Z, Overbury SH (2013) Surface structure dependence of selective oxidation of
ethanol on faceted CeO 2 nanocrystals. J Catal 306:164–176
12. Parfitt GD, Rochester CH (1983) Adsorption from solutions at the solid/liquid interface.
Academic Press, London, p 416
13. Zazhigalov VA, Sachuk OV, Kopachevska NS, Starchevskyy VL, Sawlowicz Z (2017) Effect of
ultrasonic treatment on formation of nanodimensional structures in ZnO–MoO 3 system. Theor
Exp Chem 53(1):51–57
14. Sachuk O, Kopachevska N, Kuznetsova L, Zazhigalov V, Starchevskyy V (2017) Influence
of ultrasonic treatment on the properties of ZnO-MoO 3 oxide system. Chem Chem Technol
11(2):152–157
15. Seguin L, Figlarz M, Cavagnat R, Lassegues J-C (1995) Infrared and Raman spectra of MoO 3
molybdenum trioxides and MoO 3 ×xH 2 O molybdenum trioxide hydrates. Spectrochim Acta A
51(8):1323–1344
16. Mancheva M, Iordanova R, Kamenova AA, Stoyanova A, Dimitriev Y, Kunev B (2007) Influence of mechanical treatment on morphology of the MoO 3 nanocrystals. Nanosci Nanotechnol
7:74–76
17. Chiang TH, Yeh HC (2013) The synthesis of α-MoO 3 by ethylene glycol. Materials
6(10):4609–4625
18. Angelici C, Weckhuysen BM, Bruijnincx PCA (2013) Chemocatalytic conversion of ethanol
into butadiene and other bulk chemicals. ChemSusChem 6(9):1595–1614
19. Solsona B, Zazhigalov VA, Lopez Nieto JM, Bacherikova IV, Diyuk EA (2003) Oxidative
dehydrogenation of ethane on promoted VPO catalysts. Appl ´atal A Gen 249(1):81–92
20. Zazhigalov VA, Diyuk EA, Sidorchuk VV (2014) Development of VPO catalysts supported on
mesoporous modified materials based on an aerosil gel. Kinet Catal 55(3):380–389
309
2. Zhao S, Li J, Wang L, Wang X (2010) Degradation of Rhodamine B and Safranin-T by
MoO 3 :CeO 2 nanofibers and air using a continuous mode. Clean (Weinh) 38(3):268–274
3. Sobhani-Nasab A, Maddahfar M, Hosseinpour-Mashkani SM (2016) Ce(MoO 4 ) 2 nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, and its photocatalyst application through the ultrasonic
method. J Mol Liq 216:1–5
4. Mohamed MM, Katib SMA (2005) Structural and catalytic characteristics of MoO 3 /CeO 2
catalysts: CO oxidation activity. Appl Catal A Gen 287(2):236–243
5. Chang H, Jong MT, Wang C, Qu R, Du Y, Li J, Hao J (2013) Design strategies for P-containing
fuels adaptable CeO 2 −MoO 3 catalysts for DeNO x : significance of phosphorus resistance and
N 2 selectivity. Environ Sci Technol 47(20):11692–11699
6. Zhu J, Gao F, Dong L, Yu W, Qi L, Wang Z, Dong L, Chen Y (2010) Studies on surface
structure of M x O y /MoO 3 /CeO 2 system (M = Ni, Cu, Fe) and its influence on SCR of NO by
NH 3 . Appl Catal B Environ 95(1–2):144–152
7. Yoshitake H, Aoki Y, Hemmi S (2006) Mesoporous titania supported-molybdenum catalyst:
the formation of a new mesophase and use in ethanol-oxygen catalytic reactions. Microporous
Mesoporous Mater 93(1–3):294–303
8. Yang J-I, Lee D-W, Lee J-H, Hyun JC, Lee K-Y (2000) Selective and high catalytic activity of
Cs n H 4−n PMo 11 VO 40 (n≥3) for oxidation of ethanol. Appl Catal A Gen 194-195:123–127
9. Gonçalves FM, Medeiros PRS, Appel LG (2001) The role of cerium in the oxidation of ethanol
over SnO 2 -supported molybdenum oxides. Appl Catal A Gen 208(1–2):265–270
10. Eckert M, Fleischmann G, Jira R, Bolt HM, Golka K (2006) Acetaldehyde,
in: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a01_031.pub2
11. Li M, Wu Z, Overbury SH (2013) Surface structure dependence of selective oxidation of
ethanol on faceted CeO 2 nanocrystals. J Catal 306:164–176
12. Parfitt GD, Rochester CH (1983) Adsorption from solutions at the solid/liquid interface.
Academic Press, London, p 416
13. Zazhigalov VA, Sachuk OV, Kopachevska NS, Starchevskyy VL, Sawlowicz Z (2017) Effect of
ultrasonic treatment on formation of nanodimensional structures in ZnO–MoO 3 system. Theor
Exp Chem 53(1):51–57
14. Sachuk O, Kopachevska N, Kuznetsova L, Zazhigalov V, Starchevskyy V (2017) Influence
of ultrasonic treatment on the properties of ZnO-MoO 3 oxide system. Chem Chem Technol
11(2):152–157
15. Seguin L, Figlarz M, Cavagnat R, Lassegues J-C (1995) Infrared and Raman spectra of MoO 3
molybdenum trioxides and MoO 3 ×xH 2 O molybdenum trioxide hydrates. Spectrochim Acta A
51(8):1323–1344
16. Mancheva M, Iordanova R, Kamenova AA, Stoyanova A, Dimitriev Y, Kunev B (2007) Influence of mechanical treatment on morphology of the MoO 3 nanocrystals. Nanosci Nanotechnol
7:74–76
17. Chiang TH, Yeh HC (2013) The synthesis of α-MoO 3 by ethylene glycol. Materials
6(10):4609–4625
18. Angelici C, Weckhuysen BM, Bruijnincx PCA (2013) Chemocatalytic conversion of ethanol
into butadiene and other bulk chemicals. ChemSusChem 6(9):1595–1614
19. Solsona B, Zazhigalov VA, Lopez Nieto JM, Bacherikova IV, Diyuk EA (2003) Oxidative
dehydrogenation of ethane on promoted VPO catalysts. Appl ´atal A Gen 249(1):81–92
20. Zazhigalov VA, Diyuk EA, Sidorchuk VV (2014) Development of VPO catalysts supported on
mesoporous modified materials based on an aerosil gel. Kinet Catal 55(3):380–389