xxxv
Table 2.1 Some background assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Table 2.2 Some consequences of the assumptions listed in Table 2.1 . . . . . . . 24
Table 2.3 Notation for general and individual properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Table 4.1 Comparison of definitions of
according to different criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
Table 7.1 A comparison of direct and indirect methods of measurement,
with respect to the role of the computation component . . . . . . . . . 202
Table 7.2 A comparison of three general methods
of measurement, provisionally called “method A”,
“method B”, and “method C” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
Table 7.3 A comparison of basic evaluation equations
and basic evaluation scales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
List of Tables